Improved HPLC Method with Automated Pre-Column Sample Derivatisation for Serum Pegylated L-Asparaginase Activity Measurement in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Patients

Yan Qi Tan,C-Khai Loh,Shamin bin Mohd Saffian,Suzana binti Makpol
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116243
IF: 3.571
2024-05-29
Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
Abstract:Therapeutic drug monitoring of pegylated L-asparaginase (ASNase) ensures the drug effectiveness in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients. The biological drug property with variable immunogenic host clearance, and the prescription of its generic formulation urge the need for a reliable assay to ensure an optimal treatment and improve outcome. This study aimed to optimise an existing isocratic reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method with an automated pre-column sample derivatisation and injection program, and a computational algorithm for measuring serum pegylated ASNase activity in children with ALL. Nath et al.'s method in 2009 was adopted and modified using a pegylated ASNase. A set of Microsoft Excel macros was developed for the serum drug activity computation. An Agilent InfinityLab LC Series 1260 Infinity II Quaternary System with fluorescence detection was employed with an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 4.6×100 mm, 2.7 μm analytical column. System flow rate was optimised to 2.0 mL/min with 40×10 -6 /bar pump compressibility. The O-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) solution composition was optimised to 1% o -phthaldialdehyde, 0.8% 2-mercaptoethanol, 7.13% methanol, and 1.81% sodium tetraborate. The pre-column derivatisation program mixed 0.1 μL sample with 25 μL OPA solution before the automated injection. Method validation was according to the ICH guidelines. Total analysis time was 15 minutes, with L-aspartic acid eluted at 0.96 min and internal standard at 4.7 min. The calibration curves showed excellent linearity (R ≥0.9999). Interday precision for the drug activity at 0.1 IU/mL, 0.5 IU/mL, and 1 IU/mL were 4.15%, 3.05%, and 3.09% ( n = 6). Mean %error for the drug activity at 0.1 IU/mL, 0.5 IU/mL, and 1 IU/mL were 0.90±4.41%, -1.37±3.04%, and -3.03±3.02% ( n = 6). Limit of quantitation was 0.03 IU/mL. Majority of the patients' serum drug activity fell within the assay calibration range. Our improved method is automated, having shorter analysis time with a well-maintained separation resolution that enables a high-throughput analysis for application.
pharmacology & pharmacy,chemistry, analytical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?