Polygenetic Titanites Constraining the Genesis Of Neoproterozoic Leucogranite-Hosted U Mineralization at the Western Margin of The Yangtze Block

Lu Xiang,Jia Guo,Minghui Yin,Hao Song,Zhengqi Xu,Zhuang Duan,Zeying Zhu,Rucheng Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4198007

2022-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Accurately constraining the age and source of primary U mineralization is commonly difficult as diverse U minerals are affected by α-recoils and subjected to overprints of multi-stage fluids. Titanite has a good potential in revealing rock-forming and metallogenic information, and widely occurs in magmatic, metamorphic, and hydrothermal U deposits. However, the textural and chemical characteristics of titanite from most U deposits are poorly documented and little is known about the relationship between titanite and U mineralization. At the western margin of the Yangtze Block, a series of uranium occurrences and high-grade uraninite-predominant ores are hosted in the leucogranitic dykes, e.g., fine-grained albitite, monzogranite, and pegmatitic quartz vein. The genesis of U mineralization remains unclear largely because of the uncertainties as to the timing of mineralization and the origin of metals.Here, we present comprehensive U-Pb and Sm-Nd isotopic data, and major and trace element compositions for metamorphic (Ttn-I) and magmatic/hydrothermal (Ttn-II) titanites from the leucogranitic dykes and/or amphibolitic wall rocks. Ttn-I is in direct contact with metamorphic hornblende and plagioclase or occurs as irregular relics captured by the leucogranites, and is thus inferred to be the product of amphibolite facies metamorphism. Chemically, Ttn-I is characterized by low Fe/Al ratios, LREE-depleted patterns and weakly negative to positive Eu anomalies. By contrast, magmatic/hydrothermal Ttn-II crystals intergrown with uraninite in the leucogranites generally display flatter REE patterns, more negative Eu anomalies, higher Fe/Al ratios, and U, Nb, REE and Y contents, which could be applied as an indicator for U exploration. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating on Ttn-I yielded ages of ~860 Ma for amphibolite facies metamorphism. Instead, U-Pb dating on syn-ore Ttn-II yielded ages of ~786–779 Ma for U mineralization, which is coeval with the emplacement of leucogranitic dykes. Uraninite and intergrown Ttn-II have uniform, negative εNd(t) values (–5.7 to –15.5), indicating the initial melts were predominantly sourced from the old crustal materials (T DM2 = ~1.9–2.7 Ga). Considering the dyke-shape occurrences, feldspar-quartz-dominant lithologies, and wide textural and compositional variations of leucogranitic dykes, and obviously negative Eu anomalies in uraninite and titanite, we suggest that low-degree partial melting of U-rich protolith, subsequent fractional crystallization of plagioclase and assimilation of wall rocks may have contributed to uranium mineralization.