The Psychological Emptiness Scale: a psychometric evaluation

Shona Joyce Herron,Rob Saunders,Fabio Sani,Janet Feigenbaum
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.649
2024-02-01
BJPsych Open
Abstract:Background Feelings of emptiness are commonly reported as deeply distressing experiences. Despite established relationships between emptiness and many mental health difficulties, alongside self-harm and suicide, further study into this phenomenon has been restricted by vague definition and clinical measures with limited utility. Recently the first definition validated by individuals with lived experience of emptiness has been conceptualised, providing an opportunity to create a new measure of emptiness. Aims This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate the 31-item Psychological Emptiness Scale (PES), identifying redundancy, and thus creating a psychometrically robust scale with optimised clinical utility. Method Utilising an online survey design, 768 participants completed the 31 items of the initial PES alongside other measures of mental health. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted, and item response theory employed to identify item redundancy and reduce test burden. Expert clinicians provided ratings of each item's clinical relevance and, combined with the psychometric analysis, led to the removal of a number of items. Confirmatory factor analysis was then undertaken. Reliability including test–retest, validity and sensitivity of the measure were evaluated. Results A two-factor structure encompassing ‘nothingness’ and ‘detachment’ was identified, and found to have acceptable fit. The resulting 19-item PES was found to have internal consistency ( α = 0.95), convergent validity and test–retest reliability. Conclusions This study demonstrated strong psychometric properties of the PES. The PES has potential to support research into the role of emptiness in psychological distress and treatment in clinical practice.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper focuses on the development and evaluation of the "Psychological Emptiness Scale (PES)". The background of the study indicates that emptiness is a common and distressing psychological experience that is associated with various mental health issues, self-harm, and suicidal behavior. However, existing clinical measurement tools have limitations in terms of definition and validity. Based on the latest definition of emptiness, the researchers aim to create a new scale to more accurately measure this phenomenon. The research objective is to assess the redundancy of the 31 items in PES through psychometric methods (exploratory factor analysis and item response theory) in order to form a concise scale with statistical robustness and clinical utility. Data was collected through online surveys, and 768 participants completed multiple psychological health scales including PES. Through analysis, a structure consisting of two factors, "sense of nothingness" and "sense of alienation," was identified, and the scale was reduced to 19 items by removing some items. The results of the study showed that the 19-item PES has good internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability. The conclusion suggests that PES has potential in studying the role of emptiness in psychological distress and in assessing treatment effects in clinical practice. In summary, this paper aims to address how to develop and validate a valid measure of psychological emptiness, in order to enhance understanding and clinical application of this phenomenon.