The Effectiveness of Ozone Infiltration on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rafael Llombart-Blanco,Gonzalo Mariscal,Violeta Cordón,Carlos Barrios,María Benlloch,Rafael Llombart-Ais
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14111406
2024-11-02
Life
Abstract:Background/Objective: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence on the relative efficacy of ozone injections for improving patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: A literature search was conducted in four databases, and PROMs were analyzed. Odds ratios (ORs), mean differences, and standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager. Results: Nine studies (total number of participants = 1711) were included. Overall, the ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) showed favorable results for ozone (SMD −0.28, 95% CI −0.51 to −0.06). However, subgroup analysis by follow-up time found no significant differences at 2 weeks or 6 months but significant differences at 1 month. The VAS also favored ozone use overall (SMD −0.12, 95% CI −0.24 −0.01). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses revealed no significant differences between groups. There were also no significant differences in excellent outcomes (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.67) or poor outcomes (OR 1.25, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.37). Conclusions: Ozone therapy has demonstrated limited benefits over the usual care for lower back pain. While a small advantage emerged for function at one month, the results were inconsistent, and no differences were seen in pain or clinical outcomes.
biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?