Abstract:Honey bee foragers use a "waggle dance" to inform nestmates about direction and distance to locations of attractive food. The sound and air flows generated by dancer's wing and abdominal vibrations have been implicated as important cues, but the decoding mechanisms for these dance messages are poorly understood. To understand the neural mechanisms of honey bee dance communication, we analyzed the anatomy of antenna and Johnston's organ (JO) in the pedicel of the antenna, as well as the mechanical and neural response characteristics of antenna and JO to acoustic stimuli, respectively. The honey bee JO consists of about 300-320 scolopidia connected with about 48 cuticular "knobs" around the circumference of the pedicel. Each scolopidium contains bipolar sensory neurons with both type I and II cilia. The mechanical sensitivities of the antennal flagellum are specifically high in response to low but not high intensity stimuli of 265-350 Hz frequencies. The structural characteristics of antenna but not JO neurons seem to be responsible for the non-linear responses of the flagellum in contrast to mosquito and fruit fly. The honey bee flagellum is a sensitive movement detector responding to 20 nm tip displacement, which is comparable to female mosquito. Furthermore, the JO neurons have the ability to preserve both frequency and temporal information of acoustic stimuli including the "waggle dance" sound. Intriguingly, the response of JO neurons was found to be age-dependent, demonstrating that the dance communication is only possible between aged foragers. These results suggest that the matured honey bee antennae and JO neurons are best tuned to detect 250-300 Hz sound generated during "waggle dance" from the distance in a dark hive, and that sufficient responses of the JO neurons are obtained by reducing the mechanical sensitivity of the flagellum in a near-field of dancer. This nonlinear effect brings about dynamic range compression in the honey bee auditory system.

The sounds produced by flies and bees

Probing Acoustic Communication during Fly Reproductive Behaviors.

Mosquito (Aedes aegypti) flight tones: frequency, harmonicity, spherical spreading, and phase relationships

Chasing Flies: The Use of Wingbeat Frequency as a Communication Cue in Calyptrate Flies (Diptera: Calyptratae)

Sound generation in the flapping wing flight of insects

Mechanism and scaling of wing tone generation in mosquitoes

How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird's hum and other animals in flapping flight

Moth resonant mechanics are tuned to wingbeat frequency and energetic demands

Wing buzzing as a mechanism for generating vibrational signals in psyllids (Hemiptera: Psylloidea)

Dynamic range compression in the honey bee auditory system toward waggle dance sounds

How Hummingbirds Hum: Oscillating Aerodynamic Forces Explain Timbre of the Humming Sound

Acoustic sensitivity of fly antennae

Comparative forewing ultrastructure of high-frequency singing crickets (Eneopterinae)

The complex world of honey bee vibrational signaling: A response to Ramsey et al. (2017)

The sound and the fury--bees hiss when expecting danger

Auditory neuroscience in fruit flies

Biophysical Aspects of Sound Communication in Insects

3D audio-visual recordings of mosquito wings for aeroacoustic simulation

MOTOR OUTPUT PATTERNS DURING RANDOM AND RHYTHMIC STIMULATION OF LOCUST THORACIC GANGLIA

Buzz-pollinating bees deliver thoracic vibrations to flowers through periodic biting