Systematic review and meta-analysis: Physical-procedural interventions used to reduce pain during intramuscular injections in adults.

Nevin Kuzu Kurban,Arife Şanlialp Zeyrek,Şenay Takmak,Sümeyye Arslan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14183
IF: 3.057
2019-12-01
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Abstract:AIMS To assess the effectiveness of physical-procedural interventions in reducing pain during intramuscular injections. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD English keywords were used to search databases [MEDLINE (OVID, Ebsco), SCOPUS, Science Direct, COCHRANE and the reference lists from retrieved articles] from their inception to November 2017 and randomized and quasi-experimental trials were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standardized mean difference and random effects model were used. RESULTS From 2318 articles, 15 articles (1996-2017) met the criteria for the meta-analysis. Physical-procedural interventions described in the articles were included in this systematic review. The overall standardized mean difference was 0.595 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.417-0.773), indicating a moderate effect on pain levels. Generally, these interventions (two-needle technique, acupressure, manual pressure, ShotBlocker, Z-technique, airlock technique, injection site postinjection massage and speed of injection) have been found to moderately reduce pain. CONCLUSION It seems difficult to conclude that a single intervention reduces pain in adults. However, we can state that the most effective interventions for reducing pain during intramuscular injections in adults involve the ventrogluteal site, the Z-technique and manual pressure. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?