Imagining Simpler Worlds to Understand the Complexity of Our Own.
Edwin P. Gerber,Kevin DallaSanta,Aman Gupta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001753
IF: 37.8
2019-11-27
Circulation
Abstract:The atmospheric circulation response to global warming is important for accurate prediction of climate change on regional scales. For the midlatitudes, shifts in the extratropical jet streams have important consequences for precipitation, blocking, and extreme events. It has proven to be a challenge, however, to predict. For example, the North Atlantic jet stream plays a vital role in the climate of eastern North America and Europe; in the last intercomparison of state‐of‐the‐art climate models, the models did not even agree on the sign of its wintertime response to global warming. Perhaps this should not come as a surprise, as we also lack a comprehensive theory for the impact of warming on the midlatitude circulation. In a recent study, Tan et al. (2019, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001492 ) constructed models of simpler atmospheres to explore the response of the midlatitude jet to global warming. Their idealized atmospheres highlight the difficulty of developing a comprehensive theory for the midlatitude circulation but also provide pathways to improve models of Earth's atmosphere. Models of simpler atmospheres allow one to isolate the impact of specific atmospheric processes and connect theoretical understanding with comprehensive climate prediction systems. Such models can also be used to explore very different atmospheric regimes, from Earth's past to distant planets. 1 A Long Time Ago, in a Galaxy Far, Far Away⋯ Four planets orbit stars just like our own Sun. They are the same size as Earth, with similar orbits and rotation rates, but since their axes of rotation are not tilted, they have no seasonal cycle. Their surfaces are remarkably uniform, "swamp worlds" of fixed heat capacity that cannot transport heat like our ocean, with no topographic features or differences in albedo to perturb the zonal structure of the climate. The atmospheric composition on each planet varies, however, leading to different interactions between their atmospheres and outgoing terrestrial (infrared) radiation. On the first planet, the atmosphere interacts uniformly with all infrared frequencies. Think of it as "gray radiation" (e.g., Frierson et al., 2006 ), in that radiative transfer—absorption, scattering, and emission—does not depend on the color or frequency of the light. On Earth, the key players in the infrared, water vapor and carbon dioxide, only interact with certain frequency bands due to their molecular structure, which has a significant impact on how radiative heating and cooling are distributed throughout the atmospheric column. The overall opacity, or thickness of the atmosphere to radiation, is comparable to Earth's atmosphere but exhibits no temporal variation. This is because even though the planet has the equivalent of a hydrological cycle, its condensible "water vapor" is transparent to radiation, and there are no clouds, which would interact with both the outgoing terrestrial and the incoming solar radiation. The circulation can thus transport latent energy upward and polarward, influencing both the atmospheric stability and equator‐to‐pole temperature gradients, but the water vapor itself has no direct interaction with radiative transfer. On the second planet, radiative transfer depends on the frequency of the terrestrial radiation. As a result, the distribution of radiative heating and cooling is more similar to that on Earth, notably in differences between the troposphere and stratosphere. Frequencies with which the atmosphere interacts weakly allow radiation from the surface and lower troposphere to more easily escape to space. To maintain energy balance, the radiation escaping at frequencies that are more strongly absorbed and emitted must be reduced. This requires cooling at upper levels, where only these frequencies can still interact with the thinning atmosphere. The opacity is still constant in time, however, because there is no direct interaction between infrared radiation and the planet's water vapor. The third planet differs in that its water vapor can absorb and emit infrared radiation, albeit more simply than on Earth. The hydrological cycle now directly interacts with radiative transfer, allowing for a feedback between water vapor and temperature. When the atmosphere holds more moisture, it becomes more optically thick, trapping infrared radiation that warms the surface and lower atmosphere until the atmosphere can come back into radiative balance. A feedback loop is possible, as warmer air can in turn hold more -Abstract Truncated-
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease