Abstract:Background Contextual cueing refers to the phenomenon in which individuals utilize frequently encountered environmental contexts, comprised of distractors, as cues to expedite a target search. Due to the conflict between the widespread occurrence of contextual cue transfer and the observed impact of changing the identity of distractors on contextual cue learning, the content of contextual cue representations remains contentious. Considering the independent nature of contextual cue learning and expression, our proposition is twofold: (1) Contextual cue representations are stimulus-specific, and (2) their expression is highly flexible. Methods To validate the model, two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 aimed to confirm the hypothesis that contextual cue representations are stimulus-specific. We manipulated the identity consistency of distractors within repeated scenes during contextual cue learning. Difficulty in contextual cue learning under the identity-changing condition would suggest the necessity of identity within contextual cue representation, indicating the stimulus-specific nature of these representations. Experiment 2 was designed to affirm the conclusion of Experiment 1 and explore the flexibility in the expression of contextual cue representations. This experiment comprised two phases: learning and testing. During the learning phase, participants were exposed to two sets of repeated scenes in different colors under two learning conditions: load and no-load. Working memory load was introduced to interfere with the expression to prevent it from becoming automatic. In the subsequent testing phase, the colors of the two scene sets were interchanged to impede retrieval based on identity. If both load and no-load conditions demonstrate similar levels of contextual cue effects during the testing phase, it implies the flexibility in the expression of contextual cue representations and confirms the conclusion of Experiment 1. Results In Experiment 1, a notable contextual cue learning effect was observed under the identity-consistent condition ( p = 0.001). However, this effect was not evident under the identity-changing condition ( p = 0.286). This finding strongly supports the stimulus-specific nature of contextual cue representation. In Experiment 2, the contextual cueing effect appeared but did not show a significant difference between the two conditions ( t (23) = 0.02, p = 0.987, BF 10 = 0.215), indicating the cognitive system’s ability to flexibly redefine retrieval cues. This adaptability aligns with our hypothesis and confirms the high flexibility in the expression process of contextual cue representations and confirms the conclusion of Experiment 1.

Relational Cues are Affectively Differentiated

The representation of contextual cue is stimulus-specific yet its expression is flexible

Which way is which? Examining global/local processing with symbolic cues.

Exploratory Study of Equivalence under Conjoint Select and Reject Control

Culture, Control, and Perception of Relationships in the Environment.

EXPRESS: Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers

Structural Similarity Exerts Opposing Effects on Perceptual Differentiation and Categorization: An fMRI Study

Language systematizes attention: How relational language enhances relational representation by guiding attention

The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

Contingent Capture Can Occur at Specific Feature Values: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence

Predictive cues elicit a liminal confirmation bias in the moral evaluation of real-world images

When a causal assumption is not satisfied by reality: differential brain responses to concessive and causal relations during sentence comprehension

Resolving competing predictions in speech: How qualitatively different cues and cue reliability contribute to phoneme identification

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning

On the relative detectability of configural properties

Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding.

Comparing Retro-Cue Benefit Mechanisms in Visual Working Memory: Completely Valid Vs. Highly Valid Retro-Cues

The influence of absolute and relative spatial cues on change detection performance

The influence of categorical stimuli on relational memory binding

Affective stimuli capture attention regardless of categorical distinctiveness: An emotion-induced blindness study