Abstract:Background: The global food system is inflicting substantial environmental harm, necessitating a shift towards more environmentally sustainable food consumption practices. Policy interventions, for example, information campaigns, taxes and subsidies and changes in the choice context are essential to stimulate sustainable change, but their effectiveness in achieving environmental goals remains inadequately understood. Existing literature lacks a comprehensive synthesis of evidence on the role of public policies in promoting sustainable food consumption. Our systematic map addressed this gap by collecting and categorising research evidence on public policy interventions aimed at establishing environmentally sustainable food consumption patterns, in order to answer the primary research question: What evidence exists on the effects of public policy interventions for achieving environmentally sustainable food consumption? Methods: Searches for relevant records (in English) were performed in WoS, Scopus, ASSIA, ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, EconLit, Google Scholar and in bibliographies of relevant reviews. A grey literature search was also performed on 28 specialist websites (searches were made in the original language of the webpages and publications in English, Swedish, Danish and Norwegian were eligible) and Google Scholar (search in English). Screening was performed at title/abstract and full-text levels, with machine learning-aided priority screening at title/abstract level. Eligibility criteria encompassed settings, interventions (public policies on sustainable food consumption), target groups and outcomes. No critical appraisal of study validity was conducted. Data coding covered bibliographic details, study characteristics, intervention types and outcomes. Evidence was categorised into intervention types and subcategories. Visual representation utilised bar plots, diagrams, heatmaps and an evidence atlas. This produced a comprehensive overview of effects of public policy interventions on sustainable food consumption patterns. Review findings: The evidence base included 227 articles (267 interventions), with 92% of studies in high-income countries and only 4% in low-income countries. Quantitative studies dominated (83%), followed by mixed methods (16%) and qualitative studies (1%). Most interventions were information-based and 50% of reviewed studies looked at labels. Information campaigns/education interventions constituted 10% of the sample, and menu design changes and restriction/editing of choice context 8% each. Market-based interventions represented 13% of total interventions, of which two-thirds were taxes. Administrative interventions were rare (< 1%). Proxies for environmental impact (85%) were more frequent outcome measures than direct impacts (15%). Animal-source food consumption was commonly used (19%) for effects of interventions on, for example, greenhouse gas emissions. Most studies used stated preferences (61%) to evaluate interventions. Conclusions: The literature assessing policies for sustainable food consumption is dominated by studies on non-intrusive policy instruments; labels, information campaigns, menu design changes and editing choice contexts. There is a strong need for research on sustainable food policies to leave the lab and enter the real world, which will require support and cooperation of public and private sector stakeholders. Impact evaluations of large-scale interventions require scaling-up of available research funding and stronger multidisciplinary research, including collaborations with industry and other societal actors. Future research in this field should also go beyond the European and North American context, to obtain evidence on how to counteract increasing environmental pressures from food consumption worldwide.

Synergies of interventions to promote pro-environmental behaviors – A meta-analysis of experimental studies

Field interventions for climate change mitigation behaviors: A second-order meta-analysis

Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy

Call for multi-policy approach: Synergistic effects of emissions trading scheme and energy efficiency policies

Promoting pro-environmental choices while addressing energy poverty

Combining behavioural and reflective policy tools for the environment: a scoping review of behavioural public policy literature

More Green Than Gray? Toward a Sustainable Overview of Environmental Spillover Effects: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

Revisiting the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour to Inform Land Management Policy: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model Application

Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover

Synergistic Effects of Climate Change and Marine Pollution: An Overlooked Interaction in Coastal and Estuarine Areas

Show Me the Impact: Communicating “behavioral Impact Message” to Promote Pro-Environmental Consumer Behavior

Distinguishing between Low- and High-Cost Pro-Environmental Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Two Complementary Studies

Effects of public policy interventions for environmentally sustainable food consumption: a systematic map of available evidence

Behavioral Science Tools to Strengthen Energy & Environmental Policy

Do Environmental Prompts Work the Same for Everyone? A Test of Environmental Attitudes as a Moderator

Research on the influence mechanism of public green behavior guiding policy effect: from the perspective of policy synergy system

Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach

Which construal level combinations generate the most effective interventions? A field experiment on energy conservation

To select effective interventions for pro-environmental behaviour change, we need to consider determinants of behaviour

Environmental forcing and policy synergy: A multidimensional approach in the governance of air pollution and carbon emission

Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework