Socioeconomic Disadvantage Predicts Decreased Likelihood of Maintaining a Functional Knee Arthroplasty Following Treatment for Prosthetic Joint Infection

Nicholas R. Pagani,Andrew Grant,Maxwell Bamford,Nicholas Peterman,Eric L. Smith,Matthew R. Gordon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.024
IF: 4.435
2024-01-14
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Abstract:Introduction Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) carries major morbidity and mortality as well as a complicated and lengthy treatment course. In patients who have high degrees of socioeconomic disadvantage, this may be a particularly devastating complication. Our study sought to evaluate the impact of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes following treatment for PJI of the knee. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures performed for the treatment of initial PJI between 2008 and 2020 at a single tertiary-care center in the United States. The Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to quantify socioeconomic deprivation. The primary outcome measure was presence of a functional knee joint at the time of most recent follow-up defined as TKA components or an articulating spacer. A total of 96 patients were included for analysis. The median follow-up duration was 26.5 months. Results There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment failure ( P = 0.63). However, the proportion of patients who had a functional knee arthroplasty (in contrast to having undergone arthrodesis, amputation, or retention of a static spacer) declined significantly with increasing Area Deprivation index (ADI) index (81.8% for the least disadvantaged group, 58.7% for the middle group, 42.9% for the most disadvantaged group, P = 0.021). Conclusion Patients who have a higher socioeconomic disadvantage as measured by ADI are less likely to maintain a functional knee arthroplasty following treatment for TKA PJI. These findings support continued efforts to improve access to care and optimize treatment plans for patients who have socioeconomic disadvantage.
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?