Utilizing Multiple Regression Analysis and Entropy Method for Automated Aesthetic Evaluation of Interface Layouts

Xinyue Wang,Mu Tong,Yukun Song,Chengqi Xue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16050523

2024-04-27

Symmetry

Abstract:Aesthetic evaluation of increasingly complex and personalized human–computer interaction interfaces serves as a critical bridge between humans and machines, fundamentally enhancing various interaction factors. This study addresses the challenges in aesthetic evaluation by adjusting existing methodologies to incorporate seven aesthetic metrics: density, symmetry, balance, proportionality, uniformity, simplicity, and sequence. These metrics were effectively integrated into a composite evaluation metric through both multiple regression analysis and entropy methods, with the efficacy of both fitting methods validated. Leveraging automatic segmentation and recognition technology for interface screenshots, this research enables rapid, automated acquisition of evaluations for the seven metrics and the composite index, leading to the development of a prototype system for interface layout aesthetic assessment. Aimed at reducing the time, manpower, and resources required for interface evaluation, this study enhances the universality, compatibility, and flexibility of layout assessments. It promotes integration at any stage of the design process, significantly benefiting lightweight rapid evaluation and iterative design cycles, thereby advancing the field of interface aesthetic evaluation.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the challenges of automated aesthetic evaluation in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) interface design. Specifically, the study focuses on the following issues:

1. **Cost and complexity of current evaluation methods**: Traditional interface aesthetic evaluation methods require a large amount of user feedback data, which is not only time-consuming but also costly, increasing the complexity and delay of the evaluation.

2. **Lack of flexibility in evaluation within linear design processes**: Traditional methods usually conduct evaluations at the final stage of the design process, which means that if the evaluation results are not satisfactory, re-evaluation or even redesign is needed, leading to a waste of time, effort, and resources.

3. **Difficulty in comprehensive evaluation with multiple indicators**: Existing evaluation methods often involve multiple aesthetic indicators, making it difficult for designers to intuitively assess the advantages of different design schemes. Additionally, computational models become overly complex, resulting in redundancy and overlap.

To address the above issues, the researchers simplified the 14 aesthetic indicators proposed by Ngo and selected seven key indicators: density, symmetry, balance, proportion, uniformity, simplicity, and sequence. Through multiple regression analysis and the entropy method, these indicators were integrated into a comprehensive evaluation index. By utilizing automatic segmentation and recognition technology, the aesthetic evaluation values of interface screenshots can be quickly obtained, thereby developing a prototype system to achieve automated aesthetic evaluation of interface layouts. This approach aims to reduce the time, manpower, and resources required for evaluation, improve the generality, compatibility, and flexibility of the evaluation, and promote its application at various stages of the design process, thus advancing the field of interface aesthetic evaluation.