Abstract:Purpose This study was designed to evaluate the impact of laparoscopic converted to open colectomy on short-term and oncologic outcomes and to identify risk factors for long-term survival in patients undergoing colectomy for non-metastatic colon cancer. Methods A prospective database of consecutive operations for non-metastatic colon cancer was reviewed. Patients were grouped as conversion (CONV) group, completed laparoscopic resection (LAP) group, or open resection (OPEN) group. The clinical and perioperative parameters, pathologic features, and oncologic outcomes were collected. Univariate analysis was performed for comparing these data. Patients without evidence of recurrence at last follow-up or still alive at the end of study period were censored. Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to analyze survival. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of poor disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results The conversion rate was 15.2 %. The most common reason for conversion was locally advanced cancer (45.5 %). Converted patients were associated with a longer operative time (188 ± 29.1 min, P < 0.001), greater blood loss (147 ± 14 mL, P < 0.001), and a higher rate of intra-operative complications (15.2 %, P = 0.042) compared to the completely laparoscopic or open patients. Days to flatus, early ambulation, and length of hospitalization were significantly shorter in completed laparoscopic resection (LAP) group ( P < 0.001); however, the outcomes were comparable between conversion (CONV) and open resection (OPEN) groups. The incidence of wound infection was significantly higher in the OPEN group than in the LAP group ( P = 0.005), whereas there were no significant differences observed between the CONV group and the OPEN group ( P = 1.000) or between the LAP group and the CONV group ( P = 0.073). The 5-year DFS in CONV patients (46.5 %) was comparable to LAP patients (55.5 %, P = 0.138) and OPEN patients (59.1 %, P = 0.113). Moreover, there were no significant differences noted in terms of the 5-year OS in the CONV group (56.7 %) compared to the LAP group (67.3 %, P = 0.317) or the OPEN group (66.3 %, P = 0.420). The multivariate analysis showed that pT3–4 cancer ( P < 0.001) and poor differentiation ( P < 0.001) were independent predictors of both lower OS and lower DFS, whereas leakage ( P = 0.008) and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy ( P = 0.023) were independent risk factors only of lower DFS. Conclusion Conversion to open colectomy from an initial laparoscopic approach does not worsen the long-term survival in patients with non-metastatic colon cancer.

Comparative analysis of the oncologic outcomes and risk factors for open conversion in laparoscopic surgery for non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective multicenter study

The Impact of Laparoscopic Converted to Open Colectomy on Short-Term and Oncologic Outcomes for Colon Cancer

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Comparison of Early Clinical and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Converted Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.

Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion

Upfront laparotomy versus conversion from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery in colon cancer: Is there a difference in outcomes?

Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome

Clinical Study of Laparoscopic Vs Open Right Hemicolectomy for Right Colon Cancer

An artificial intelligence-designed predictive calculator of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy in colon cancer

Factors associated with and impact of open conversion on the outcomes of minimally invasive left lateral sectionectomies: An international multicenter study

Establishment of nomogram risk prediction model for conversion to open surgery in laparoscopic colorectal neoplams resections

Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer

Factors Associated with and Impact of Open Conversion in Laparoscopic and Robotic Minor Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study of 10,541 Patients

Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection

Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal malignancy in obese patients: a propensity score-weighted cohort study

Risk Factors for Conversion from Laparoscopic to Open Surgery: Analysis of 2138 Converted Operations in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Short-term and medium-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery for colorectal cancer: a single center retrospective case-control study

The comparison of oncologic and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Laparoscopic versus Open Emergency Surgery for Right Colon Cancers

Oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic colon cancer resection for T4 lesions: a case–control analysis of 7-years’ experience