Abstract:Interest in integrated tasks is increasing in second language writing, accompanied by a concern for appropriate interpretation of performances and scores from these tasks. Integrated writing adds an element not found in traditional independent writing: the use of source text material. This study investigates how source text use appears in performances on an integrated writing task, and how it differs across score levels and task topics. Educational Testing Service (ETS) supplied 480 performances on the writing section of the Internet-based Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL iBT) to explore these questions. The integrated TOEFL task involves a comparative summary of listening and reading texts that present differing views on a topic. In this study, multiple regression analysis was used to consider three areas of source text use: (1) the importance of source text ideas that writers included in their summary, (2) the use of ideas from a reading source text and from a listening text, and (3) the borrowing of exact wording from the source texts (verbatim source use). These three areas were analyzed across nine score levels and indicated that score and source use are related. Overall, these features of source text use explained over 50% of the variance in scores on the reading–listening–writing task. The use of the listening text and the inclusion of important ideas from source texts explained the most variance, while use of the reading text and verbatim source use were less predictive. The latter two held a negative correlation with score, indicating that the lower scoring essays had more of these features. These findings support the claim that integrated writing assessment elicits academic writing processes, which is reflected by score. High-scoring writers selected important ideas from the source texts and used the listening text as the task prompt instructed. Low scoring writers depended heavily on the reading texts for content and direct copying of words and phrases. These findings support the validity of interpreting integrated task scores as a measure of academic writing but provide a nuanced look at the contribution of certain source use features.

Source text borrowing in an integrated reading/writing assessment

Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score

Textual borrowing in science summaries: upper-elementary and middle school students learning to write the language of science

Source use in the story continuation writing task

Textual Borrowing Practice in English Academic Writing: From the Perspective of Content Analysis

On the basis of source: Impacts of individual differences on multiple-document integrated reading and writing tasks

Towards more valid scoring criteria for integrated reading-writing and listening-writing summary tasks

Examining Performance on an Integrated Writing Task from a Canadian English Language Proficiency Test

“I should summarize this whole paragraph”: Shared processes of reading and writing in iterative integrated assessment tasks

“Why am I paraphrasing?”: Undergraduate ESL writers' engagement with source-based academic writing and reading

Writing in a second language based on cross-linguistic sources: The language use among undergraduates in Hong Kong

The relationship between written discourse features and integrated listening-to-write scores for adolescent English language learners

Scenario-Based Assessment Of Multiple Source Use

Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment

Toward a Transparent Construct of Reading-to-Write Tasks: The Interface Between Discourse Features and Proficiency

Assessing Cohesion In Integrated Writing: An Interactive Alignment Perspective

Exploring and modeling the reading-writing connection in EFL integrated writing

The Influence of EFL Proficiency on Written Products in Independent and Integrated Writing Tasks

What accounts for integrated reading-to-write task scores?

Foregrounding Learner Voice: Chinese Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of Paraphrasing and Source Use Conventions for English Research Paper Writing

Syntactic Complexity Development in the Writings of EFL Learners: Insights from a Dependency Syntactically-Annotated Corpus