Human relevance of in vivo and in vitro skin irritation tests for hazard classification of pesticides
Hans A. Raabe Gertrude-Emilia Costin David G. Allen Anna Lowit Marco Corvaro Lindsay O'Dell Julie Breeden-Alemi Kathryn Page Monique Perron Tara Flint Silva Walter Westerink Elizabeth Baker Kristie Sullivan a Institute for In Vitro Sciences,Gaithersburg,MD,USAb Inotiv,Durham,NC,USAc US Environmental Protection Agency,Washington,DC,USAd Corteva Agriscience,Rome,Italye The Clorox Company,San Francisco,CA,USAf Charles River Laboratories,Den Bosch,The Netherlandsg Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine,Washington,DC,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2024.2387596
2024-08-26
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology
Abstract:Background: Test methods to inform hazard characterization and labeling of pesticides to protect human health are typically conducted using laboratory animals, and for skin irritation/corrosion the rabbit Draize test is currently required by many regulatory agencies. Although the Draize test is generally regarded to provide protective classifications for human health, new approach methodologies (NAMs) have been developed that offer more human relevant models that circumvent the uncertainty associated with species differences that exist between rabbits and humans. Despite wide applicability and use of these test methods across a broad range of chemicals, they have not been widely adopted for testing pesticides and pesticidal formulations. One of the barriers to adoption of these methods in this sector is low concordance with results from the Draize rabbit test, particularly for chemicals within the mild to moderate irritation spectrum.
ophthalmology,toxicology