The association between android‐to‐gynoid lean mass ratio and all‐cause and specific‐cause mortality in US adults: A prospective study

Yuxin Fan,Li Ding,Wei Li,Wei Li,Longhao Sun,Xin Li,Lina Chang,Qing He,Gang Hu,Bo Wang,Ming Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16051
2024-11-08
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Abstract:Objective The associations of lean mass distribution with mortality risk are not fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the effects of a new lean mass distribution indicator‐android/gynoid lean mass ratio (AGLR) evaluated by dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) on the risk of all‐cause and specific‐cause mortality in a NHANES cohort. Methods This was a population‐based cohort study, which included 18 542 subjects aged 20 years and older from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (US NHANES, 2003–2006 and 2011–2018). The primary outcomes of our study were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular (CVD) mortality and cancer mortality, which were obtained from the linkage to registries. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to investigate the association between lean mass distribution and mortality risk among the US NHANES general population. Restricted cubic spline nested in Cox regression was also used to test whether there was a non‐linear association of AGLR as a continuous variable with the risk of mortality. Results During a median follow‐up of 6.9 years, 1412 participants died, of whom 435 were due to CVD and 340 were due to cancer. The multivariable‐adjusted (Model 4) hazard ratios (HRs) for each SD increase in AGLR were 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40–1.67) for all‐cause mortality, 1.56 (95% CI 1.30–1.87) for cancer mortality and 1.64 (95% CI 1.47–1.84) for CVD mortality. The associations were robust in sensitivity analyses and present in most subgroups. Conclusions AGLR evaluated by DXA was associated with a higher risk of all‐cause and specific‐cause mortality among the general population from the US NHANES cohort.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?