Flexible Stocking: Livestock Production and Economic Responses in Mixed-Grass Prairie

Justin D. Derner,John P. Ritten,Tevyn Baldwin,Tamarah Jorns,Matt Mortenson,David J. Augustine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2024.01.007
IF: 2.398
2024-02-01
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Abstract:Matching animal demand to forage availability is a core principle in sustainable rangeland management. We evaluated the use of interannual flexibility in stocking rates compared with fixed stocking at light, moderate, and heavy stocking rates on livestock weight gains and economic responses for 7 yr (2016−2022) in North American northern mixed-grass prairie. The grazing season began in early June each year, so stocking rates in the flexible treatment were calculated on the basis of the amount of forage production predicted from actual precipitation received in April and May combined with long-term mean annual precipitation received at the study site in June, as well as an adjustment in stocking rate based on the amount of residual forage remaining at the end of the previous grazing season. Across years, mean stocking rate for the flexible stocking treatment (32.5 animal unit days [AUD] ha−1) was between heavy (38.6 AUD ha−1) and moderate (29.7 AUD ha−1) and was twice as high as the light (15.8 AUD ha−1). Cumulative total beef production for the 7 yr was highest with heavy stocking (282.6 kg ha−1), 17% less in the flexible (234.2 kg ha−1), and 19% less in the moderate (229.4 kg ha−1) stocking rates. It was 55% lower with light stocking (128.4 kg ha−1). Crude protein and digestible organic matter, as well as composition of plant functional groups in diets of yearlings, did not differ between the moderate versus the flexible stocking treatments. Compared with moderate stocking, flexible stocking resulted in 6.9% lower cumulative gross ($2 299) and 10.8% lower net ($1 407) economic returns per yearling. We suggest that future evaluations of flexible stocking strategies consider incorporating seasonal forecasts combined with intraseasonal adjustments in stocking rates as the growing season unfolds. Advancements in predictive forage forecasting tools and remote sensing capabilities are needed to support such a strategy.
environmental sciences,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?