Abstract:Background: The strong association between family history and prostate cancer (PCa) suggests a significant genetic contribution, yet specific highly penetrant PCa susceptibility genes have not been identified. Certain single-nucleotide-polymorphisms have been found to correlate with PCa risk; however uncertainty remains regarding their clinical utility and how to best incorporate this information into clinical decision-making. Genetic testing is available directly to consumers and both patients and healthcare providers are becoming more aware of this technology. Purchasing online allows patients to bypass their healthcare provider yet patients may have difficulty interpreting test results and providers may be called upon to interpret results. Determining optimal ways to educate both patients and providers, and strategies for appropriately incorporating this information into clinical decision-making are needed. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in Utah between October 2011 and December 2011. Eleven focus group discussions were held and surveys were administered to 23 first-degree relatives of PCa patients living in Utah and 24 primary-care physicians and urologists practicing in Utah to present specific information about these assessments and determine knowledge and attitudes regarding health implications of using these assessments. Results: Data was independently coded by two researchers (relative Kappa = .88; provider Kappa = .77) and analyzed using a grounded theory approach. Results indicated differences in attitudes and behavioral intentions between patient and provider. Despite the test's limitations relatives indicated interest in genetic testing (52%) while most providers indicated they would not recommend the test for their patients (79%). Relatives expected providers to interpret genetic test results and use results to provide personalized healthcare recommendations while the majority of providers did not think the information would be useful in patient care (92%) and indicated low-levels of genetic self-efficacy. Conclusions: Although similarities exist, discordance between provider and patient attitudes may influence the effective translation of novel genomic tests into clinical practice suggesting both patient and provider perceptions and expectations be considered in development of clinical decision-support tools.

Genetic tests obtainable through pharmacies: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the news: a descriptive analysis

Awareness, use, motivations and methods of accessing genetic testing in 2022 in the United States

Public reaction to direct-to-consumer online genetic tests: Comparing attitudes, trust and intentions across commercial and conventional providers

Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study

Clinical Utility of Microarrays: Current Status, Existing Challenges and Future Outlook

Risky Business: Risk Perception and the Use of Medical Services among Customers of DTC Personal Genetic Testing

False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care

Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health

DNA diagnostics: goals and challenges

Genetic and Genomic Consultation: Are We Ready for Direct-to-Consumer Telegenetics?

Challenges of development and implementation of point of care pharmacogenetic testing

Expansion of clinical genetic testing since the completion of the human genome project

The Future of Newborn Genomic Testing

Health and Kinship Matter: Learning About Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing User Experiences via Online Discussions

Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing in an Era of Rapid Change

[Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the Netherlands: impact on consumers and clinical practice]

Neither as harmful as feared by critics nor as empowering as promised by providers: risk information offered direct to consumer by personal genomics companies

From symptomatic to pre-symptomatic patient: the tide of personal genomics

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenetic Conditions: A Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenge

An Altered Treatment Plan Based on Direct to Consumer (DTC) Genetic Testing: Personalized Medicine from the Patient/Pin-cushion Perspective