Abstract:Information stored in the memory system can affect visual search process. Foreknowing features of distractors could facilitate target selection. Previous studies found that after sufficient practice, participants learned to ignore fixed feature representations in working memory (WM) when they reappeared as distractors. However, varied WM representations would automatically capture attention, suggesting that we could not voluntarily inhibit varied WM representations. Current studies investigated whether active-maintained varied representations could be suppressed as those fixed representations. In study 1, participants were requested to find a specific shape (target) in the search array and indicate the location of a dot inside the target. The fixed color-cue in each trial indicated that target would not be among shapes in the cued color. Meanwhile, there was a constant color, which would never be the target (and never appeared as cue color) during the entire experiment. In negative-cue condition, distractor color in search array was the cue color, while the target color was randomly selected. In constant color condition, distractor color was the constant color which was a long-term memory (LTM) representation. In neutral condition, both target color and distractor color were randomly selected with the restriction that they would never be the cue color nor the constant color. We found that, compared to neutral conditions, both fixed WM representations and LTM representations could facilitate visual search. In study 2, we varied the cue in each trial. Results showed that reaction time (RT) of negative-cue condition was significantly shorter than neutral condition when reaction speed was slow. Importantly, even in fast RT condition, there was no capture effect. In all, our results indicated that participants could voluntarily suppress both fixed and varied WM representations when they reappeared as distractors. However, facilitation of varied representation only happened when cognitive control process had sufficient time to execute.

Conceptual masking disrupts change-detection performance

When Shorter Delays Lead to Worse Memories: Task Disruption Makes Visual Working Memory Temporarily Vulnerable to Test Interference

Congruence with items held in visual working memory boosts invisible stimuli into awareness: Evidence from motion-induced blindness

Visual Masking Effect Depends on the Perceived Locations of Objects

The Effect of Masker Type and Word-Position on Word Recall and Sentence Understanding

Contributions of temporal and spatial masking signals in perception of sequential visual events

The Neurophysiology of Backward Visual Masking: Information Analysis

Attentional load leads to distinct changes in early and late cortical processing of target visibility under visual masking

Visual masking: past accomplishments, present status, future developments

Different masking effects on "hole" and "no-hole" figures

The effect of informational masking and word position on recall

Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution

On the relationship between foveal mask interference and mental imagery in peripheral object recognition

The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference

Extending a focused attention paradigm to critically test for unconscious congruency effects

Consciousness absent and present: a neurophysiological exploration

Inhibition and working memory capacity modulate the mental space-time association

Memory-based Attentional Guidance Facilitates Visual Search Through Distractor Suppression

The Effects of Similarity on High-Level Visual Working Memory Processing

THE EFFECT OF MASKER TYPE AND WORD POSITION ON IMMEDIATE SENTENCE RECALL

Perceptual versus attentional impairments of conscious access: Distinct neural mechanisms despite equal task performance