Comparison of observation- and inventory-based methane emissions for eight large global emitters

Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu,Glen P. Peters,Richard Engelen,Sander Houweling,Dominik Brunner,Aki Tsuruta,Bradley Matthews,Prabir K. Patra,Dmitry Belikov,Rona L. Thompson,Lena Höglund-Isaksson,Wenxin Zhang,Arjo J. Segers,Giuseppe Etiope,Giancarlo Ciotoli,Philippe Peylin,Frédéric Chevallier,Tuula Aalto,Robbie M. Andrew,David Bastviken,Antoine Berchet,Grégoire Broquet,Giulia Conchedda,Stijn N. C. Dellaert,Hugo Denier van der Gon,Johannes Gütschow,Jean-Matthieu Haussaire,Ronny Lauerwald,Tiina Markkanen,Jacob C. A. van Peet,Isabelle Pison,Pierre Regnier,Espen Solum,Marko Scholze,Maria Tenkanen,Francesco N. Tubiello,Guido R. van der Werf,John R. Worden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4325-2024
IF: 11.4
2024-09-26
Earth System Science Data
Abstract:Monitoring the spatial distribution and trends in surface greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes, as well as flux attribution to natural and anthropogenic processes, is essential to track progress under the Paris Agreement and to inform its global stocktake. This study updates earlier syntheses (Petrescu et al., 2020, 2021, 2023), provides a consolidated synthesis of CH 4 emissions using bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) approaches for the European Union (EU), and is expanded to include seven additional countries with large anthropogenic and/or natural emissions (the USA, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DR Congo)). Our aim is to demonstrate the use of different emission estimates to help improve national GHG emission inventories for a diverse geographical range of stakeholders.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?