Abstract:China is in the process of establishing a national emissions trading system (ETS). Evaluating the implementation effectiveness of the seven pilot ETSs in China is critical for designing this national system. This study administered a questionnaire survey to assess the behaviour of enterprises covered by the seven ETS pilots from the perspective of: the strictness of compliance measures; rules for monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV); the mitigation pressure felt by enterprises; and actual mitigation and trading activities. The results show that the pilot MRV and compliance rules have not yet been fully implemented. The main factors involved are the lack of compulsory force of the regulations and the lack of policy awareness within the affected enterprises. Most enterprises have a shortage of free allowances and thus believe that the ETSs have increased their production costs. Most enterprises have already established mitigation targets. Some of the covered enterprises are aware of their own internal emission reduction costs and most of these have used this as an important reference in trading. Many enterprises have accounted for carbon prices in their long-term investment. The proportion of enterprises that have participated in trading is fairly high; however, reluctance to sell is quite pervasive in the market, and enterprises are mostly motivated to trade simply in order to achieve compliance. Few enterprises are willing to manage their allowances in a market-oriented manner. Different free allowance allocation methods directly affect the pathways enterprises take to control emissions. Key policy insights In the national ETS, the compulsory force of ETS provisions should be strengthened.A reasonable level of free allowance shortage should be ensured to promote emission reduction by enterprises.Sufficient information should be provided to guide enterprises in their allowance management to activate the market.To promote the implementation of mitigation technologies by enterprises, actual output-based allocation methods should be used.The government should use market adjustment mechanisms, such as a price floor and ceiling, to ensure that carbon prices are reasonable and stable, so as to guide long-term low carbon investment. In the national ETS, the compulsory force of ETS provisions should be strengthened. A reasonable level of free allowance shortage should be ensured to promote emission reduction by enterprises. Sufficient information should be provided to guide enterprises in their allowance management to activate the market. To promote the implementation of mitigation technologies by enterprises, actual output-based allocation methods should be used. The government should use market adjustment mechanisms, such as a price floor and ceiling, to ensure that carbon prices are reasonable and stable, so as to guide long-term low carbon investment.

Does emission trading system (ETS) deserve further promotion in the building sector? Evidence from China

The energy conservation and emission reduction co-benefits of China's emission trading system

Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China’s Eight ETS Pilots

Emissions Trading in China: Progress and Prospects

Introducing the emissions trading system to China’s electricity sector: Challenges and opportunities

How an emission trading system affects carbon emissions? Evidence from the urban agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, China

Can Carbon Emission Trading Policy Improve the Emission Performance? Evidence From China

Has China’s Emission Trading System Achieved the Development of a Low-Carbon Economy in High-Emission Industrial Subsectors?

Analysis on the Carbon Trading Approach in Promoting Sustainable Buildings in China

Investigation of policy tools for energy efficiency improvement in public buildings in China—current situation, obstacles, and solutions

Urban carbon emission intensity under emission trading system in a developing economy: evidence from 273 Chinese cities

How does the carbon trading scheme promote the decarbonization of China's power sector?

Have China's Emissions Trading Systems Reduced Carbon Emissions? Firm-Level Evidence from the Power Sector

Does the pilot emissions trading system in China promote innovation? Evidence based on green technology innovation in the energy sector

Evaluating regional carbon emissions trading in China: effects, pathways, co-benefits, spillovers, and prospects

Can carbon reduction policies promote sustainable construction development? Evidence from China’s green building market

Can carbon reduction policies promote sustainable construction development? Evidence from China's green building market

Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China

Testing mechanisms through which China's ETS promotes a low-carbon transition

Does emission trading system achieve the win-win of carbon emission reduction and financial performance improvement? —Evidence from Chinese A-share listed firms in industrial sector

Have China’s pilot emissions trading schemes promoted carbon emission reductions?– The evidence from industrial sub-sectors at the provincial level