Characteristics and prognosis of rrDLBCL with TP53 mutations and a high‐risk subgroup represented by the co‐mutations of DDX3X‐TP53

Fan Gao,Kai Hu,Peihao Zheng,Hui Shi,Xiaoyan Ke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5756
IF: 4.711
2023-03-28
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical characteristics of rrDLBCL patients with TP53 mutations and their prognostic factors, receiving CAR‐T therapy (chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy), which revealed that the TP53 mutations still be a reverse prognostic factor. The median overall survival time of 40 patients with TP53 mutations was 24.5 months, while their median progression‐free survival time after CAR‐T was 6.8 months. In patients with TP53 mutations, the performance status (ECOG score) was identified as the most important prognostic factor. Moreover, the patients with TP53‐DDX3X co‐mutations were identified as a subgroup with an extremely bad prognosis. Background TP53 mutations have a prognostic significance in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL) patients, and their treatment still faces a great challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with TP53 mutations (TP53mut) in the context of CAR‐T therapy (Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell therapy) as well as explore the heterogeneity in their cohort and identify the possible risk factors. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the clinical characteristics of rrDLBCL patients with TP53 mutations and their prognostic factors, receiving CAR‐T therapy. And the expression level of TP53 and DDX3X, which was an important co‐mutation of TP53 revealed in the cohort, were explored in public databases and cell lines. Results The median overall survival time of 40 patients with TP53 mutations was 24.5 months, while their median progression‐free survival time after CAR‐T was 6.8 months. There were no significant differences in the ORR (objective remission rate, X2 = 3.0498, p > 0.05) and PFS (after CAR‐T therapy) between the patients with wild‐type and mutated TP53 genes after CAR‐T therapy, while the OS of patients with TP53 mutations was significantly worse (p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?