Cognitive outcomes from the randomised, active-controlled Ketamine for Adult Depression Study (KADS)

Donel M. Martin,Anna J. Harvey,Bernard Baune,Michael Berk,Gregory L. Carter,Vanessa Dong,Nick Glozier,Paul Glue,Sean Hood,Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic,Maree Hackett,Natalie Mills,Shanthi Sarma,Andrew Somogyi,Anthony Rodgers,Colleen K. Loo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.052
IF: 6.533
2024-02-21
Journal of Affective Disorders
Abstract:Background Due to its rapid antidepressant effect, ketamine has recently been clinically translated for people with treatment-resistant depression. However, its cognitive profile remains unclear, particularly with repeated and higher doses. In the present study, we report the cognitive results from a recent large multicentre randomised controlled trial, the Ketamine for Adult Depression Study (KADS). Methods In this randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel group, multicentre phase 3 trial study we investigated potential cognitive changes following repeated treatment of subcutaneous racemic ketamine compared to an active comparator, midazolam, over 4 weeks, which involved two cohorts; Cohort 1 involved a fixed dose treatment protocol (0.5 mg/kg ketamine), Cohort 2 involved a dose escalation protocol (0.5–0.9 mg/kg) based on mood outcomes. Participants with treatment-resistant Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) were recruited from 7 mood disorder centres and were randomly assigned to receive ketamine (Cohort 1 n = 33; Cohort 2 n = 53) or midazolam (Cohort 1 n = 35; Cohort 2 n = 53) in a 1:1 ratio. Cognitive measurements were assessed at baseline and at the end of randomised treatment. Results Results showed that in Cohort 1, there were no differences between ketamine and midazolam in cognitive outcomes. For Cohort 2, there was similarly no difference between conditions for cognitive outcomes. Limitations The study included two Cohorts with different dosing regimes. Conclusions The findings support the cognitive safety of repeated fixed and escalating doses at least in the short-term in people with treatment resistant MDD.
psychiatry,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?