Abstract:The decisions of whether and how to evacuate during a climate disaster are influenced by a wide range of factors, including emergency messaging, social influences, and sociodemographics. Further complexity is introduced when multiple hazards occur simultaneously, such as a flood evacuation taking place amid a viral pandemic that requires physical distancing. Such multihazard events can necessitate a nuanced navigation of competing decision-making strategies wherein a desire to follow peers is weighed against contagion risks. To better understand these trade-offs, we distributed an online survey during a COVID-19 pandemic surge in July 2020 to 600 individuals in three midwestern and three southern states in the United States with high risk of flooding. In this paper, we estimate a random parameter discrete choice model in both preference space and willingness-to-pay space. The results of our model show that the directionality and magnitude of the influence of peers' choices of whether and how to evacuate vary widely across respondents. Overall, the decision of whether to evacuate is positively impacted by peer behavior, while the decision of how to evacuate (i.e., ride-type selection) is negatively impacted by peer influence. Furthermore, an increase in flood threat level lessens the magnitude of peer impacts. In terms of the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, respondents who perceive it to be a major health risk are more reluctant to evacuate, but this effect is mitigated by increased flood threat level. These findings have important implications for the design of tailored emergency messaging strategies and the role of shared rides in multihazard evacuations. Specifically, emphasizing or deemphasizing the severity of each threat in a multihazard scenario may assist in: (1) encouraging a reprioritization of competing risk perceptions; and (2) magnifying or neutralizing the impacts of social influence, thereby (3) nudging evacuation decision-making toward a desired outcome.

An empirical analysis of learning and forgetting mechanisms in repeated evacuations: A panel recursive logit approach

Short-term panel data analysis of the effect of flood risk communication on individual evacuation decisions

Evacuation travel behavior in regret minimization or utility maximization rules? Evidence from emergency context

Measuring and Modeling Behavioral Decision Dynamics in Collective Evacuation

Travel Mode Decision Behavior under Regret View for Emergency Evacuation

Integrating Regret Psychology To Travel Mode Choice For A Transit-Oriented Evacuation Strategy

Empirical Study of Individual Evacuation Decision-making in Fire Accidents: Evacuate Intention and Herding Effect.

Mass evacuation planning for disasters management: A household evacuation route choice behavior analysis

Predicting Hurricane Evacuation Decisions with Interpretable Machine Learning Models

Predicting Hurricane Evacuation Decisions with Interpretable Machine Learning Methods

Data-Driven Models for Individual and Group Decision Making

Analysis of Evacuation Route Choice Decision Using the Hybrid Utility-Regret Model

Collective Decision Dynamics in Group Evacuation: Behavioral Experiment and Machine Learning Models

Protection or Peril of Following the Crowd in a Pandemic-Concurrent Flood Evacuation

An Analysis of Factors Influencing Disaster Mobility Using Location Data from Smartphones: Case Study of Western Japan Flooding

Who contributes to disaster preparedness? Predicting decision making in social dilemmas pertaining to community resilience

Who Leaves and Who Stays? A Review and Statistical Meta-Analysis of Hurricane Evacuation Studies

Analysis of Carless Emergency Evacuation Decision-making Behaviors Under Typhoon Disasters

Behavior Selection Models of Fire Evacuations with the Consideration of Adaptive Evacuation Psychologies

Data-Driven Bayesian Network Models of Hurricane Evacuation Decision Making

Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? Or Should I Wait and See? Influences on Wildfire Evacuation Decisions