Association of county‐level provider density with hepatobiliary cancer incidence and mortality

Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan,Muhammad Musaab Munir,Razeen Thammachack,Yutaka Endo,Abdullah Altaf,Selamawit Woldesenbet,Zayed Rashid,Mujtaba Khalil,Mary Dillhoff,Susan Tsai,Timothy M. Pawlik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12316
IF: 3.282
2024-08-18
World Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Background Access to healthcare providers is a key factor in reducing cancer incidence and mortality, underscoring the significance of provider density as a crucial metric of health quality. We sought to characterize the association of provider density on hepatobiliary cancer population‐level incidence and mortality. Study Design County‐level hepatobiliary cancer incidence and mortality data from 2016 to 2020 and provider data from 2016 to 2018 were obtained from the CDC and Area Health Resource File. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to evaluate the relationship between provider density and hepatobiliary cancer incidence and mortality. Results Among 1359 counties, 851 (62.6%) and 508 (37.4%) counties were categorized as urban and rural, respectively. The median number of providers in any given county was 104 (IQR: 44–306), while provider density was 120.1 (IQR: 86.7–172.2) per 100,000 population; median household income was 45,050–$61,655). Low provider‐density counties were more likely to have a greater proportion of residents over 65 years of age (52.7% vs. 49.6%) who were uninsured (17.4% vs. 13.2%) versus higher provider‐density counties (p
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?