Abstract:Background: Bi-directional gene pairs have received considerable attention for their prevalence in vertebrate genomes. However, their biological relevance and exact regulatory mechanism remain less understood. To study the inner properties of this gene organization and the difference between bi- and uni-directional genes, we conducted a genome-wide investigation in terms of their sequence composition, functional association and regulatory motif discovery.Results: We identified 1210 bi-directional gene pairs based on the GRCh37 assembly data, accounting for 11.6% of all the human genes owning RNAs. CpG islands were detected in 98.42% of bi-directional promoters and 61.07% of unidirectional promoters. Functional enrichment analysis in GO and GeneGO both revealed that bi-directional genes tend to be associated with housekeeping functions in metabolism pathways and nuclear processes, and 46.84% of the pair members are involved in the same biological function. By fold-enrichment analysis, we characterized 73 and 43 putative transcription factor binding sites(TFBS) that preferentially occur in bi-directional promoters from TRANSFAC and JASPAR database respectively. By text mining, some of them were verified by individual experiments and several novel binding motifs were also identified.Conclusions: Bi-directional promoters feature a significant enrichment of CpG-islands as well as a high GC content. We provided insight into the function constraints of bi-directional genes and found that paired genes are biased toward functional similarities. We hypothesized that the functional association underlies the co-expression of bidirectional genes. Furthermore, we proposed a set of putative regulatory motifs in the bi-directional promoters for further experimental studies to investigate transcriptional regulation of bi-directional genes.

Economy of Effort or Sophisticated Programming? The Prevalence of Bidirectional Promoter Complexes in the Human Genome

Promoter Directionality is Controlled by U1 Snrnp and Polyadenylation Signals

Compatibility rules of human enhancer and promoter sequences

Human promoter directionality is determined by transcriptional initiation and the opposing activities of INTS11 and CDK9

The preservation of bidirectional promoter architecture in Eukaryotes - Functional or co-regulation constraint?

The preservation of bidirectional promoter architecture in eukaryotes: what is the driving force?

Genome-Wide Analysis of the Transcription Factor Binding Preference of Human Bi-Directional Promoters and Functional Annotation of Related Gene Pairs

Enhancer–promoter specificity in gene transcription: molecular mechanisms and disease associations

Extensive Promoter-Centered Chromatin Interactions Provide A Topological Basis for Transcription Regulation

Determinants of enhancer and promoter activities of regulatory elements

Transcription initiation patterns indicate divergent strategies for gene regulation at the chromatin level.

Towards a rational approach to promoter engineering: understanding the complexity of transcription initiation in prokaryotes

Transcription directionality is licensed by Integrator at active human promoters

High-throughput functional analysis of lncRNA core promoters elucidates rules governing tissue specificity

Molecular interplay between RNA polymerase and two transcriptional regulators in promoter switch

An unexpected abundance of bidirectional promoters within Salmonella Typhimurium plasmids

Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control

Directionality of Transcriptional Regulatory Elements

Developmental and housekeeping transcriptional programs display distinct modes of enhancer-enhancer cooperativity in Drosophila

RNA polymerase II dynamics shape enhancer–promoter interactions

Transcription of two human genes from a bidirectional endogenous retrovirus promoter