Abstract:Mitigating climate change by reducing anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions is considered an urgent challenge for society. In this context, different philosophies exist. A classic debate, referred to as "boomsters vs. doomsters", asks whether humanity's drive for technological innovations will mitigate climate change, or whether it is justifiable to compromise our living standards, affluence, and consumption patterns. A Danish research project has elucidated this topic through cross-collaboration between historians and engineers by quantifying the personal consumption-based carbon footprint (CF) of Danish citizens, taking into account the consumption segments of food, transport, housing, and furniture. Quantification is conducted through life-cycle assessments (LCA) of five decadal timesteps during the period 1860–2020. As only one other study conducting historical (retrospective) LCA with an extensive time horizon was identified in the scientific literature, our own study provides novel insights by exploring possible approaches in this field. Historical LCA has many similarities with prospective (future) LCA, providing inspiration to the approach. The main challenge of the study is to adjust both foreground and background systems in the inventory modelling phase. Data is largely based on national statistics, books, museum case studies, expert testimonials, and proxies such as using the steam turbine as an indicator of improvements to technological efficiency over time. The results show a slightly declining carbon footprint in the period 1860–1930, from 7.7 to 6.6 t CO 2 -eq per capita annually. Unsurprisingly the footprint peak is not found until the 1970s, at 11 t, reducing to 5.4 t in the 2010s. The residential energy consumption segment contributes half of this CF, followed by transportation by road and rail. Discussion of the results shows that whether technology can mitigate the impact from the increase in affluence depends on the specific consumption segment. For housing combined with residential energy, the results show that technology can mitigate increases in CF, despite the comforts of home having only increased over time. For the transportation segment, however, the past century has seen an eightfold increase in CF due to the pronounced evolution of personal modes of transportation. The findings suggests that the "boomsters vs. doomsters" debate is not so black and white after all. We further suggest that historical LCA, in tandem with prospective LCA, can provide valuable insights for decision support to facilitate a green transition and hence a green future.

Rebound effects flatten differences in carbon footprints between car-free households, minimal drivers, and green car owners

The impact of low-carbon consumption options on carbon footprints in the Nordic region

Willingness to reduce travel consumption to support a low-carbon transition beyond COVID-19

Travel footprints in the Nordics

Does car sharing reduce greenhouse gas emissions? Life cycle assessment of the modal shift and lifetime shift rebound effects

Save A Tree or 6 kg of CO2? Understanding Effective Carbon Footprint Interventions for Eco-Friendly Vehicular Choices

Rebound effect of carbon emissions of new energy vehicle consumption: a case study of Beijing

Rebound effects undermine carbon footprint reduction potential of autonomous electric vehicles

Household Carbon Footprint Characteristics and Driving Factors: A Global Comparison Based on a Dynamic Input–Output Model

Comparing urban form influences on travel distance, car ownership, and mode choice

Achieving Low-Carbon Urban Passenger Transport in China: Insights from the Heterogeneous Rebound Effect

Household carbon footprint patterns by the degree of urbanisation in Europe

'Green' on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel

Decarbonizing Transport in the European Union: Emission Performance Standards and the Perspectives for a European Green Deal

Exhaust Emissions and Energy Consumption Analysis of Conventional, Hybrid, and Electric Vehicles in Real Driving Cycles

The Impact of Vehicle Technology, Size Class, and Driving Style on the GHG and Pollutant Emissions of Passenger Cars

Pioneering historical LCA - A perspective on the development of personal carbon footprint 1860–2020 in Denmark

What Influences the Choice Between Private Car and Public Transport for Shopping Trips? Impact of Socio-economic and Built Environment Factors

Factors driving reduction in CO2 emissions from personal travel: A repeated cross-sectional analysis

Impact Analysis of Residential Relocation on Ownership, Usage, and Carbon-Dioxide Emissions of Private Cars

The role of socio-demographic and psychological factors in shaping individual carbon footprints in Finland