Abstract:Background: Performing THA in patients with high-riding developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is associated with serious complications and technical challenges. Various methods of shortening osteotomy are available to facilitate femoral head reduction during THA in patients with high-riding hips; subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy plus proximal shortening are the most common techniques. However, which approach is superior remains a topic of controversy. Questions/purposes: (1) Is there any difference in clinical outcomes (defined as the Harris Hip Score [HHS] and residual limb length discrepancy) at a minimum of 3 years between subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy in patients with Crowe Type IV DDH who underwent THA? (2) Is there any difference in the risk or type of complications between the two approaches? Methods: We performed a retrospective, comparative study of two groups (subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy versus trochanteric slide osteotomy) matched for sex and preoperative HHS at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Between 2010 and 2018, we performed 67 THAs in patients with unilateral Crowe Type IV DDH. During that time, we generally used a trochanteric slide osteotomy for THA in all patients with Crowe Type IV hips and performed subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy when a conical stem was not available. A total of 42% (28) had THA with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy, and 58% (39) had THA with trochanteric slide osteotomy. Of those, 89% (25) and 74% (29), respectively, were accounted for with complete datasets for possible matching at a minimum of 3 years of follow-up. Patients were matched for gender and preoperative HSS (within 10 points), leaving 22 patients in each group (79% of the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group and 56% of the trochanteric slide osteotomy group) for evaluation and analysis. Age (42 versus 46 years), gender (female: 73% versus 73%), preoperative HSS (40 versus 40), and preoperative leg length discrepancy (5.9 versus 5.3 cm) were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). The trochanteric slide osteotomy group exclusively received Cone Wagner (Zimmer) implants (100%), while Corail (DePuy Synthes) implants (77%) were the most commonly used in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group. HHS at a minimum of 3 years as well as the presence or absence of a limp and Trendelenburg sign, functional leg length discrepancy, nonunion, nerve palsy, and other surgical complications were recorded and compared between the groups based on data drawn from a longitudinally maintained institutional database. Results: At a mean follow-up of 73 months, improvement in HHS was greater in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group than in the trochanteric slide osteotomy group (48 ± 4 points versus 36 ± 11 points, mean difference 12 points [95% CI 7 to 17 points]; p < 0.001). Although the preoperative leg length discrepancy was similar between the groups, there was a greater postoperative improvement in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy group (44 ± 8 mm and 38 ± 8 mm in the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and trochanteric slide osteotomy groups, respectively; p = 0.02). The risk of nonunion was higher with a trochanteric slide osteotomy than with a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy (23% [5 of 22] versus 0% [0 of 22]; p = 0.048). Other complications, including intraoperative periprosthetic fractures, nerve palsy, heterotopic ossification, revision surgery, and dislocation, did not differ between the groups. Conclusion: In patients with Crowe Type IV hips undergoing THA, surgeons might consider subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy rather than trochanteric slide osteotomy to minimize the risk of nonunion and achieve superior hip function. Better correction of leg length discrepancy may also be possible with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. The long-term survivorship of hips after these two techniques, as well as the influence of the specific anatomy of the proximal femur on the choice of technique, remain to be explored in future studies. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Combined with Proximal Femoral Reconstruction Effectively Treats Severe Hip Deformities: A Novel Osteotomy Technique

Femoral reconstruction in patients with proximal femoral deformity in total hip arthroplasty]

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cementless Cups and Femoral Head Autografts for Patients with Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis

[Total Hip Arthroplasty for Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip with S-ROM Prosthesis].

A Bound-Ca 2+ Model of Synaptic Facilitation Revisited

Short-term clinical outcomes of outpatient total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure

[Surgical technique and early clinical outcomes of direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty]

Medium- to long-term clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty with structural bone grafting for dysplasia of the hip

Surgical hip dislocation technique through the femoral head fovea fenestration and impaction bone grafting for the treatment of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study

[Total Hip Arthroplasty with Uncemented Cup and Femoral Head Autografts for Coxarthrosis Due to Dysplasia].

Surgical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Paavilainen Osteotomy in Patients Who Have High Developmental Hip Dislocation: Mean 4.4 Year Follow-Up

Clinical Application of Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Short-Neck and Straight Stem for Treatment of Developmental Dysplastic Hip with High Dislocation

[Application of high hip center technique in total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe typeⅡand Ⅲ developmental dysplasia of hip and severe hip osteoarthritis]

Special aspects of total hip arthroplasty in patients with proximal femur pseudarthrosis

Cementless total hip arthroplasty for treatment of acetabular protrusion secondary to rheumatoid arthritis

The Role of Global Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty with High Hip Center Technique

Total Hip Arthroplasty with Extra-small Femoral Stems in Extremely Hypoplastic Femurs: A Case-Series Study

Improved surgical exposure and early clinical outcomes using a femoral-release-first technique in direct anterior approach during total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty after failed transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: analysis of three-dimensional morphological features

Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy Provides Superior Function to Trochanter Slide Osteotomy in THA for Patients With Unilateral Crowe Type IV Dysplasia at a Minimum of 3 Years