Abstract:Genetic engineering is one of the most advanced technologies in the world and can bring vast profits to developers by patenting resultant achievements. But genetic engineering must be based on original genetic materials. For obtaining such materials, developers travel around the world, especially to genetically rich areas in developing countries, to prospect for valuable genetic resources and bring back for research and patent derivate products. However a lot of disputes have arisen from such patents, such as the Enola patent dispute on Mexican traditional crop mayocoba bean and the patent dispute on sacred plant Ayahuasca between people and one U.S. Company. Indigenous people, who live in the origin areas of genetic resources for a long history, have established traditional and cultural genuine relation with some living species. These disputes revealed that some genetic engineering exploitation and patents based on certain species may be severely offensive against indigenous peoples spiritual, religious, or cultural traditions. Although genetic engineering achievements patentability has been argued for a long time, the TRIPs Agreement requirement and the worlds legislation trend, either in developed countries such as the U.S., European Union or in developing countries such as China, have indicated that genetic engineering products and processes are legitimately patentable. But some loophole exists in the patent acquisition procedure of current legislation, which allows such offensive patents to be granted. To prevent such offensive patents, one prior consents solution is proposed in this article, which requires genetic engineering developers to obtain prior consents from origin countries of genetic resources before they exploit these resources and patent derivate achievements. This solution is based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, which affirmed countrys sovereignty over their genetic resources and allowed countries to regulate and manage genetic resources in their territory. The Convention on Biological Diversity does not conflict with IPR legislation, in particular the TRIPs Agreement and the obligations under both treaties should be respected. The implementation of this proposed solution is based on the establishment of national genetic resources authority, which generally manages its countrys genetic resources and works as indigenous peoples representative with the authorization of state government. This solution should be implemented in three levels: domestically, transnationally and globally. Therefore, offensive genetic engineering patents could be prevented both by such authoritys examination and granting prior consents before developers access to genetic resources and by national patent administrations examination on prior consents proof from origin countrys authority before granting patents.

Balancing Protection of Plant Varieties and Other Public Interests

Analysis of Injury to Agriculture of Unfair Intellectual Property Protection towards Farm Produce in China

TRIPS Downhill: India's Plant Variety Protection System and Implications for Small Farmers

The System of New Plant Varieties of China under the Framework of UPOV Convention

Plant Variety Protection: Current Practices and Insights

Plant variety protection in developing countries. A report from the field

Intellectual property protection: An emphasis on plant varieties

A Differentiated Approach to Plant Variety Protection in Africa

What is the impact of India's plant variety protection act? An analytical examination based on registrations under this act.

Breeding Apples for Oranges: Africa's Misplaced Priority Over Plant Breeders' Rights

Essentially Derived Varieties in View of New Breeding Technologies – Plant Breeders’ Rights at a Crossroads

Plant Variety Protection Regime in Relation to Relevant International Obligations: Implications for Smallholder Farmers in Kenya

Prior Consents: Preventing Offensive Genetic Engineering Patents Against Indigenous People's Rights

Towards a Fair Scope of Protection for Plant Breeders’ Rights in an Era of New Breeding Techniques: Proposals for a Modernization of the Essentially Derived Variety Concept

Intellectual Property Protection of Plant Innovation

Enhancing national food security by protecting intellectual property rights for farmers in breeding local plant varieties

A Comprehensive Review on the Impacts of Intellectual Property Rights on the Global Agricultural Economy

Canadian plant breeder opinions regarding changes to plant breeders rights

Pakistan - Understanding Its Law on Plant Variety Rights

Impact of Plant Breeders Rights on Technology Availability in China