Stent placement for the prevention of clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticojejunostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ying Sun,Yongfeng Li,Zhiqiang Liu,Tao Peng,Chunyou Wang,Heshui Wu,Shanmiao Gou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.04.002
IF: 3.125
2024-04-05
The American Journal of Surgery
Abstract:Objectives There remains a lack of consensus regarding the benefits of stent placement following pancreaticojejunostomy in terms of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistulas (CR-POPFs). This study was aimed at analyzing the effects of stent placement, stent technique (internal and external), stent size, and dilation of the main pancreatic duct on CR-POPFs. Methods Our study comprised a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials involving patients undergoing pancreaticojejunostomy. The primary outcome was defined as the incidence of CR-POPFs. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted, and pooled analyses were performed to provide comparative references. Results Twelve randomized controlled trials, including a total of 1117 patients, were included. Compared with no stent placement, stenting did not exhibit a significant association with reduced CR-POPF incidence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.34–1.04, P = 0.07). Subgroup analysis revealed that only external stents, and not internal stents, were significantly associated with a reduced CR-POPF incidence compared with no stent placement (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.28–0.99, P = 0.05 vs. OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.28–3.05, P = 0.89). Furthermore, stent placement in patients with a main pancreatic duct diameter of ≤3 mm, and not in those with a main pancreatic duct diameter of >3 mm, was associated with a significantly reduced CR-POPF incidence compared with no stent placement (OR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.07–0.78, P = 0.02 vs. OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 0.41–6.06, P = 0.50). Conclusions The findings suggest a potential role for external stent placement in the prevention of CR-POPFs after pancreaticojejunostomy, particularly in patients with undilated pancreatic ducts. The reliability of our findings is constrained by the limited number of studies included. Prospero registration number CRD42022380103.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?