Comparing health care outcomes before and after employing nurse practitioners in cardiovascular hospitals in Japan: A retrospective chart review

Miho Suzuki,Natsuko Sekiguchi,Masato Saitoh,Masahide Koda,Nahoko Harada,Kazuya Honda,Tomoko Araki,Takemi Kudo,Takako Watanabe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jxx.0000000000001046
2024-07-23
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Abstract:ABSTRACT Background: There are approximately 872 certified nurse practitioners (NPs) in Japan as of April 2024. However, research on the results of their specific activities is still scarce. Purpose: This study aimed to compare health care outcomes before (i.e., 2019) and after (i.e., 2021) employing NPs in cardiovascular hospitals in Japan. Methodology: We conducted a retrospective chart review and analyzed 114 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in Hospital A and 381 patients who received pacemaker implantation/replacement in Hospital B. Hospital A hired one NP for cardiac surgery service, and Hospital B hired one NP for pacemaker device service. The NPs assisted in the surgical procedures and provided postsurgical management. Results: In Hospital A, the median length of hospitalization and intubation were shorter in 2021 than in 2019 ( p = .02 and .01, respectively). In Hospital B, medical fee reimbursement was lower in 2021 ( p < .001) than in 2019, and the median procedure duration was shorter ( p = .01), which remained statistically significant after controlling for age, comorbidities, and device types. Some outcomes improved following the employment of NPs, whereas others remained unchanged. Conclusions: Nurse practitioners managed surgical patients well and contributed to the quality care of cardiovascular medicine. Implications: The employment of NPs in Japan is encouraged because even a single NP can have a positive, although not large, impact on patients and organizations.
nursing,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?