Abstract:Abstract Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is conventionally managed with topical minoxidil, while platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and oral minoxidil present alternative options. Head-to-head trials are scarce, necessitating a comparative study. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil (2.5 mg once daily), topical minoxidil (5% twice daily), and PRP (four sessions, conducted every 4 weeks) combined with topical minoxidil 5% twice daily in individuals with AGA. Natural regulatory T cells (Tregs; CD4+ CD25high FOXP3+) reside within hair follicles, fostering the proliferation of hair follicular stem cells (HFSCs) through the NOTCH signalling pathway by elevating Jagged1 ligand expression. Additionally, the study explored the impact of these treatments on Treg cell populations – inducible Treg cells (CD4+ CD25low FOXP3+) and natural Treg cells (CD4+ CD25high FOXP3+) – and signalling molecules including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA)4, NOTCH and Jagged1. In total 66 male participants were randomly assigned to three groups of 22 patients each: oral minoxidil (Group 1), topical minoxidil (Group 2) and PRP with topical minoxidil (Group 3). Clinical and videodermoscopic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks, over 32 weeks. Treg cell populations and signalling molecules were analysed in skin biopsies (n = 5 from each group) obtained at baseline and 32 weeks. At 32 weeks, six (27%) patients each in Group 1 and Group 3, and three (14%) patients in Group 2 showed improvement in the grade of AGA. At 32 weeks, Group 3 significantly surpassed Groups 1 and 2 in increasing terminal hair density (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively). Group 1 had notably decreased vellus hairs compared with Group 3 (P = 0.02), and no significant difference was seen between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.2). Reduction in hair diameter diversity was observed with all three modalities, with earlier responses in Groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.01). A proportionate significant increase in natural Treg cells and a decrease in inducible Treg cells was observed at week 32 compared with baseline, without significant modality-specific differences: Group 1, mean 36.2 (SD 15); Group 2, mean 22 (SD 3.4); Group 3, mean 33.7 (SD 10); P = 0.31. A mean decrease in CTLA4 level and an increase in NOTCH and Jagged1 levels with a weakly negative nonsignificant correlation was observed in all three groups at week 32, with no modality-specific differences. Combining PRP with topical minoxidil achieved superior terminal hair density, while oral minoxidil exhibited an advantage in reducing vellus hair density. The study endorses low-dose oral minoxidil as an alternative to topical use and indicates the benefits of combining oral or topical minoxidil with PRP.

Microneedling in androgenetic alopecia; comparing two different depths of microneedles

Comparison of Microneedling with Platelet Rich Plasma vs Minoxidil (5%)+Finasteride (0.1%) Topical Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Randomised Clinical Study

A randomized evaluator blinded study of effect of microneedling in androgenetic alopecia: A pilot study

Effect of Microneedle on Hair Regrowth in Patients with Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Preliminary results of the use of scalp microneedling in different types of alopecia

Randomized trial of electrodynamic microneedling combined with 5% minoxidil topical solution for treating androgenetic alopecia in Chinese males and molecular mechanistic study of the involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway

Response to microneedling treatment in men with androgenetic alopecia who failed to respond to conventional therapy

Comparison of a New 5% Minoxidil Foam and Rogaine® in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Chinese Men: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Equivalence Trial

Comparison of a New 5% Minoxidil Foam and Rogaine? in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia in Chinese Men: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Equivalence Trial

Observation on the Efficacy of a Combined Treatment for Moderate and Severe Androgenetic Alopecia Incorporating Electric Microneedles

Microneedling for the treatment of hair loss?

Efficacy and safety of combined microneedling therapy for androgenic alopecia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials

Efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy Combined with Scalp Microneedling using Clobetasol Propionate 0,05% Solution for the Management of Androgenetic Alopecia

Comparative Efficacy of Minoxidil, Dermaroller, and PRP Treatments in Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA): A Clinical Study

Randomized trial of electrodynamic microneedle combined with 5% minoxidil topical solution for the treatment of Chinese male Androgenetic alopecia

Microneedling and Its Use in Hair Loss Disorders: A Systematic Review

The efficacy of light-guiding microneedle patch for stimulating hair growth in androgenetic alopecia

BH06 (P110) Comparative efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil, topical minoxidil, and platelet-rich plasma with topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial

P110 Comparative efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil, topical minoxidil, and platelet-rich plasma with topical minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia: a randomized controlled trial

Relative Effects of Minoxidil 5%, Platelet-Rich Plasma, and Microneedling in Pattern Hair Loss: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis