Development of a web-based ecological momentary assessment tool to measure day-to-day variability of the symptoms in patients with Sjögrens disease

Laurie Georgel,Anas-Alexis Benyoussef,Sofian Berrouiguet,Dewi Guellec,Guillermo Carvajal Alegria,Thierry Marhadour,Sandrine Jousse-Joulin,Béatrice Cochener-Lamard,Marc Labetoulle,Jacques-Eric Gottenberg,Tristan Bourcier,Gaétane Nocturne,Alain Saraux,Xavier Mariette,Maëlys Consigny,Michel Gravey,Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec,Raphaele Seror,Divi Cornec
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004526
2024-10-03
RMD Open
Abstract:Objectives To develop and validate a web-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) tool to enhance symptoms monitoring among patients with Sjögren's disease (SjD). Methods Consecutive adults with SjD were enrolled in this pilot observational study. Participants used the WebApp over a 3-month period, for the daily collection of individual EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) scales and separate assessment of eyes and mouth dryness, using 0–10 numerical scales. Primary outcome was the measure of the interdaily variability of symptoms. Data collected through the WebApp were compared with those obtained with paper-based questionnaires administered during a final visit, using distinct approaches (predicted error, maximum negative error and maximum positive error). User experience was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS) score. Results Among the 45 participants, 41 (91.1%) were women. Median age was 57 years (IQR: 49–66). Daily variability of symptoms ranged between 0.5 and 0.8 points across the scales. Over the 3-month period, the predicted error ranged between –1.2 and –0.3 points of the numerical scales. The greatest differences were found for fatigue (–1.2 points (IQR: –2.3 to –0.2)) and ESSPRI score (–1.2 points (IQR: –1.7 to –0.3)). Over the last 2 weeks, the predicted error ranged between – 1.2 and 0.0 points. Maximum negative error ranged between –2.0 and –1.0 points, and maximum positive error between –0.3 and 0.0 points. Median SUS score was 90 (IQR: 85–95). Conclusion Our results demonstrate the usability and the relevance of our web-based EMA tool for capturing data that closely reflects daily experiences of patients with SjD.
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?