Impact of baseline and trajectory of the atherogenic index of plasma on incident diabetic kidney disease and retinopathy in participants with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study

Jia Zhang,Cong Liu,Ying Peng,Qianhua Fang,Xing Wei,Cui Zhang,Lin Sun,Zhuomeng Hu,Jie Hong,Weiqiong Gu,Weiqing Wang,Juan Shi,Yifei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-024-02003-5
2024-01-13
Lipids in Health and Disease
Abstract:Some studies have assessed the predictive role of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) for macrovascular diseases. This prospective investigation aimed to elucidate whether AIP is associated with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) incidence.
biochemistry & molecular biology,nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This study aims to investigate whether the plasma atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is associated with the occurrence of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Specifically, the research hopes to evaluate the predictive value of baseline AIP levels and their trajectory changes during follow-up for the risk of developing DKD and DR. ### Research Background Type 2 diabetes has become a global health challenge, with chronic vascular complications being the main cause of mortality. These complications affect lifespan and bring economic burdens. Metabolic factors, especially dyslipidemia, play a crucial role in these vascular complications. Despite achieving target levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), diabetic patients still experience vascular complications, indicating that using a single lipid indicator (such as LDL-C) is insufficient to explain vascular damage in diabetic patients. Therefore, exploring a comprehensive lipid profile to better predict and assess the risk of diabetic vascular complications is particularly important. ### Research Methods The study data comes from 4831 participants, with 2943 and 3360 T2D patients included in the follow-up analysis for DKD and DR, respectively. The relationship between baseline AIP values and the risk of DKD and DR was tested using Cox regression models, and group-based trajectory modeling was used to identify AIP trajectory changes during follow-up. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the impact of AIP trajectories on the incidence of DKD and DR. ### Main Results - **DKD**: During the follow-up period, 709 out of 2943 participants (24.1%) newly developed DKD. Multivariable Cox regression models showed a positive correlation between baseline AIP and the occurrence of DKD, with a hazard ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36–2.26). Three different AIP trajectories were identified: low (31.4%), medium (50.2%), and high (18.3%). Compared to the low AIP trajectory, participants with medium and high AIP trajectories had an increased risk of developing DKD by 84% (95% CI 1.46–2.32) and 117% (95% CI 1.62–2.91), respectively. - **DR**: Among 3360 participants, 193 (5.7%) newly developed DR. Baseline AIP levels or trajectories were not significantly associated with the occurrence of DR. ### Conclusion The study found that baseline AIP levels and their trajectory changes during follow-up were positively associated with the risk of developing DKD but not DR. These results suggest that AIP may be a valuable predictive indicator for assessing the risk of DKD in T2D patients, but not for DR. Regular screening and proactive management of AIP may help prevent the occurrence of DKD.