Experience of a systematic approach to care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand
Christine Ellen Gill,Paul James Mitchell,Jan Clark,Jillian Cornish,Peter Fergusson,Nigel Gilchrist,Lynne Hayman,Sue Hornblow,David Kim,Denise Mackenzie,Stella Milsom,Adrienne von Tunzelmann,Elizabeth Binns,Kim Fergusson,Stewart Fleming,Sarah Hurring,Rebbecca Lilley,Caroline Miller,Pierre Navarre,Andrea Pettett,Shankar Sankaran,Min Yee Seow,Jenny Sincock,Nicola Ward,Mark Wright,Jacqueline Clare Therese Close,Ian Andrew Harris,Elizabeth Armstrong,Jamie Hallen,Joanna Hikaka,Ngaire Kerse,Andrea Vujnovich,Kirtan Ganda,Markus Joachim Seibel,Thomas Jackson,Paul Kennedy,Kirsten Malpas,Leona Dann,Carl Shuker,Colleen Dunne,Philip Wood,Jay Magaziner,David Marsh,Irewin Tabu,Cyrus Cooper,Philippe Halbout,Muhammad Kassim Javaid,Kristina Åkesson,Anastasia Soulié Mlotek,Eric Brûlé-Champagne,Roger Harris
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01138-1
2022-08-02
Abstract:This narrative review describes efforts to improve the care and prevention of fragility fractures in New Zealand from 2012 to 2022. This includes development of clinical standards and registries to benchmark provision of care, and public awareness campaigns to promote a life-course approach to bone health. Purpose: This review describes the development and implementation of a systematic approach to care and prevention for New Zealanders with fragility fractures, and those at high risk of first fracture. Progression of existing initiatives and introduction of new initiatives are proposed for the period 2022 to 2030. Methods: In 2012, Osteoporosis New Zealand developed and published a strategy with objectives relating to people who sustain hip and other fragility fractures, those at high risk of first fragility fracture or falls and all older people. The strategy also advocated formation of a national fragility fracture alliance to expedite change. Results: In 2017, a previously informal national alliance was formalised under the Live Stronger for Longer programme, which includes stakeholder organisations from relevant sectors, including government, healthcare professionals, charities and the health system. Outputs of this alliance include development of Australian and New Zealand clinical guidelines, clinical standards and quality indicators and a bi-national registry that underpins efforts to improve hip fracture care. All 22 hospitals in New Zealand that operate on hip fracture patients currently submit data to the registry. An analogous approach is ongoing to improve secondary fracture prevention for people who sustain fragility fractures at other sites through nationwide access to Fracture Liaison Services. Conclusion: Widespread participation in national registries is enabling benchmarking against clinical standards as a means to improve the care of hip and other fragility fractures in New Zealand. An ongoing quality improvement programme is focused on eliminating unwarranted variation in delivery of secondary fracture prevention.