The transmission of isotopic signals from precipitation to groundwater and its controls: An experimental study with soil cylinders of various soil textures and burial depths in a monsoon region
Ying Jiang,Jie Li,Rui Zuo,Congjian Sun,Yuanzheng Zhai,Lijun Tian,Wei Dai,Shufang Wang,Ziqi Shang,Yulian Liu,Xuan Jiao,Yuxi Xie,Jingbang Ma,Xudong Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130746
IF: 6.4
2024-02-03
Journal of Hydrology
Abstract:The use of stable isotopic composition in groundwater as a paleoclimatic proxy assumes that the isotopic values in groundwater are inherited from the corresponding values in the source precipitation. However, several studies have observed that groundwater δ 18 O (δ 18 O g ) is not always in accordance with the average δ 18 O of precipitation (δ 18 O p ). The cause of this inconsistency is still the subject of debate. Significant reduced isotopic variability and potential deviations from precipitation to groundwater because of the aquifer itself (e.g., groundwater buried depths and soil texture) and external precipitation characteristics (e.g., rainfall intensity and duration) have been poorly quantified in terms of identifying the dominant factors. To investigate the controls on the transmission of isotopic signals from precipitation to groundwater, we present new stable isotope data for precipitation and groundwater from an experimental site using eight soil cylinders of different soil textures and burial depths in a monsoon region. We collected data at inter-event sampling intervals (30 min) during and after two heavy precipitation events (daily amounts higher than 10 mm). Our results demonstrated a significant disparity between the average isotopic values of heavy rainfall and light rainfall, despite both exhibiting decreasing isotopic patterns throughout the course of the rainfall event. Various degrees of attenuation of isotopic variations were found in outflow waters with different groundwater burial depths (GBDs) and soil textures after rainfall events. The isotopic variations were not synchronized with the outflow changes. Specifically, there were evident outflow lags in response to heavy rainfall, especially in the lysimeters with GBDs deeper than 0.5 m, while the greatest isotopic variation was observed in the early infiltrating stage. Redundancy analysis indicated that precipitation amount was the most important contributor to the outflow variation (∼51 %, p < 0.05), while GBD was the key factor for isotopic temporal variation (∼52 %, p < 0.05). These results concurred with the clustering of principal component analysis results. The mixing of soil water and heavy rainfall event components was observed in four lysimeters with mixing proportions f P varying in the range of 7 %–51 %, indicating the effective recharge from heavy rainfall. Soil evaporation was highlighted with samples located parallel to the local meteoric water line. It is recommended that groundwater isotopes in paleoclimatic studies are used with additional constraints that consider disproportionate recharge from intense rainfall, past chaotic fluctuations in groundwater dynamics, and distortions introduced by evaporation.
geosciences, multidisciplinary,water resources,engineering, civil