Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this exploratory paper is to analyze how complexity of an artifact affects designing processes of its mechanical, electric, and software sub‐systems. Design/methodology/approach Based on existing empirical research and frameworks of axiomatic design, product architecture, and product development process, the paper proposes a simple model of functional and structural design to examine how engineers' ways of thinking differ among mechanical, electric and software engineers. Findings This paper argues that products and artifacts tend to become complex (often with integral architecture) when customers' functional requirements become more demanding and societal/technological constraints become stricter, and that complex mechanical products are often accompanied by electronic control units with complex functions. This implies that designing complex mechanical products often requires intensive coordination among mechanical, electric and software engineers. This, however, is not easy, as engineers' way of thinking is often different among the three areas: mechanical engineers want to complete structural design information first to build prototypes; electrical and software engineers (the latter in particular) request complete functional information first. Research limitations/implications In order to solve the above‐mentioned mechanical‐electrical‐software coordination problem, engineers need to share basic design concept of the product in question. Heavy‐weight product managers who infuse the product concept to the project members might be the key to this coordination. Companies may need to make sure that their product development processes are friendly to all of the three groups of engineers. Originality/value Although designing complex artifacts has been a popular research theme since H. Simon's seminal work, issues of organizational coordination for developing complex products, with increasing managerial importance, need further research. With an empirical case of the automobile and electronic products, the present paper is unique in that it combines frameworks of product development processes, product architectures, and organizational capabilities.

The structure and dynamics of the auto parts industry: Product space and complexity perspectives

Region Spatial Evolution from the Macroscopical and Microcosmic Industry Perspective

Complexity and control: benchmarking of automobiles and electronic products

New Dynamics of Spatial Distribution of Industries:Based on Firm Heterogeneity

Bridging the short-term and long-term dynamics of economic structural change

Empirical Study on the Intra-Product Specialization of Yangtze River Delta: A Case Study of Auto Manufacturing Industry

Pattern-detection in the global automotive industry: a manufacturer-supplier-product network analysis

Evolution of the Automobile Industry

The complex dynamics of products and its asymptotic properties

The different structure of economic ecosystems at the scales of companies and countries

Dynamic Relationships of Knowledge Creation Activities in Supply Chains: Evidence from Patent Data in the Us Auto Industry

Spatial Constraints on Economic Interactions: A Complexity Approach to the Japanese Inter-Firm Trade Network

Organizational Dynamics of the U.S. Logistics Industry: An Economic Geography Perspective*

Large-scale structure of a nation-wide production network

System dynamics study of the Japanese automotive industry closed loop supply chain

A Case Study of Cross-Regional Automobile Enterprises

Mapping intra firm trade in the automotive sector: a network approach

Spatial evolution of automobile industry in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region

Product Dynamics and Aggregate Shocks: Evidence from Japanese Product and Firm Level Data

International technological dynamics in production sectors: An empirical analysis

Asymmetric Influence of Employees and Trading Partners on Company's Sales and its Dynamical Origin