Survival costs of reproduction are independent of energy costs in a seabird, the pelagic cormorant

Téo Barracho,Scott A. Hatch,Jana Kotzerka,Stefan Garthe,Hannes A. Schraft,Shannon Whelan,Kyle H. Elliott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11414
IF: 3.167
2024-07-25
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:Life‐history theory predicts trade‐offs between survival and reproduction, but underlying mechanisms are seldom investigated. Using a 16‐year long time series of individually monitored pelagic cormorants and 4 years of bio‐logging data, we tested whether increased energy expenditure during reproduction led to reduced survival at both population and individual level. We found no evidence for such a relationship, but older birds tended to expend less energy than younger ones. Life‐history theory predicts that investment in reproduction should decrease survival (the 'cost of reproduction'). It is often assumed that energy allocation drives such trade‐offs, with limited energy available for both reproduction and survival. However, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, maybe because survival costs of reproduction are only apparent when resources are limited. Here, we took advantage of a natural experiment created by fluctuating environmental conditions to compare energy expenditure of a seabird, the pelagic cormorant (Phalacrocorax pelagicus), between contrasting population‐scale scenarios of survival costs of reproduction. We used multi‐state capture–recapture modelling across 16 years to identify which breeding seasons induced high survival costs (survival ratebreeders
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?