Abstract:The Chang'e‐5 (CE‐5) materials represent the youngest returned lunar samples. We performed a detailed Raman spectroscopic survey (1259‐point Raman modal analysis) to evaluate the mineralogical characteristics of CE‐5 soils, constraining the source materials and shock effects of these unique samples. The mineral chemistry (e.g., Mg#3‐60 for mafic minerals) and modal abundance (first distinguishing basaltic and feldspathic glasses) of CE‐5 mare soils are different from those of Apollo high‐ and low‐Ti basalts, possibly representing an intermediate‐Ti mare basalt. The occurrence of minor Mg‐rich materials (Mg# > 70) provides evidence of contamination from ∼5% to 7% exogenous materials, possibly related to Mg‐suite rocks. The microimage analyses suggest that the CE‐5 soils are fine‐grained, mature, and unimodal particle‐size distribution, highlighting that micrometeorite reworking dominates the CE‐5 regolith evolution with minor mixing from nonmare materials. The pressure‐sensitive minerals (quartz and maskelynite) indicate that 17–25.8 GPa shock pressures might be the higher limit in a relatively young lunar terrain. The returned Chang'e‐5 (CE‐5) samples from one of the youngest mare units in northern Oceanus Procellarum on the Moon provide vital clues about late lunar thermal evolution and post deposition processes (e.g., space weathering and mixing effects) on the lunar surface, presenting quite different chemistry from typical Apollo soils. The mineralogy, geochemistry, and chorology of CE‐5 samples have been done, while new knowledge on the noncrystalline and pressure‐sensitive phases, as well as nonmare materials in the soils, is still insufficient. Here, we report the mineralogic characteristics of CE‐5 soils using Raman spectroscopy. Our results suggest the closest affinities in composition and modal mineralogy among the CE‐5 materials but distinct from Apollo mare soils, possibly representing a new type of mare basalt (intermediate‐Ti) with a minor amount (∼5%–7%) of exogenous contribution. The intermediate‐Ti CE‐5 samples have similar mineralogy and composition to the Chang’e‐3 basalts, erupting in the same volcanic episode and representing the latest lunar magmatism near 2.0 Ga in the Procellarum KREEP Terrane. We constrained relatively weaker shock pressures of the CE‐5 samples than Apollo highland materials. The CE‐5 soils can help establish a new “ground truth” for mineralogical and compositional investigations of the lunar global surface. The Chang'e‐5 samples represent a new type of mare basalt with an intermediate TiO2 content similar to the Chang’e‐3 basalts The Chang'e‐5 mare soils could be contaminated with ∼5%–7% exogenous materials related to Mg‐suite rocks Shock pressures at the Chang'e‐5 landing site are constrained at 17–25.8 GPa The Chang'e‐5 samples represent a new type of mare basalt with an intermediate TiO2 content similar to the Chang’e‐3 basalts The Chang'e‐5 mare soils could be contaminated with ∼5%–7% exogenous materials related to Mg‐suite rocks Shock pressures at the Chang'e‐5 landing site are constrained at 17–25.8 GPa

Chronology, Local Stratigraphy, and Foreign Ejecta Materials at the Chang'e‐6 Landing Site: Constraints on the Provenance of Samples Returned From the Moon's Farside

On the provenance of the Chang'E-5 lunar samples

Geological context of the Chang'e-6 landing area and implications for sample analysis

Geology of the Chang'e-5 landing site: Constraints on the sources of samples returned from a young nearside mare

Composition and Provenance of the Chang′e-6 Lunar Samples: Insights from the Simulation of the Impact Gardening Process

Surface Ages in the Vicinity of the Chang'e-6 Landing Site

Lunar Farside Samples Returned by Chang'E-6 Mission: Significance for Understanding the South Pole-Aitken Basin Stratigraphic History

Landing site of the Chang'e-6 lunar farside sample return mission from the Apollo basin

Properties and Provenance of the Lunar Regolith at Chang&#8217;E-5 Landing Site: Constraints from Remote Sensing Observations and Ejecta Deposition Models

China's Chang'e-5 landing site: Geology, stratigraphy, and provenance of materials

Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission

Long-lasting farside volcanism in the Apollo basin: Chang'e-6 landing site

A Catalogue of Impact Craters and Surface Age Analysis in the Chang'e-6 Landing Area

Extensive Intrusive Magmatism in the Lunar Farside Apollo and South Pole–Aitken Basins, Chang'e-6 Landing Site

Lunar Evolution in Light of the Chang'e-5 Returned Samples

A sample of the Moon's far side retrieved by Chang'e-6 contains 2.83-billion-year-old basalt

Geochemistry of the Von Kármán Crater Floor and Thickness of the Non-Mare Ejecta over the Chang'e-4 Landing Area

A Raman Spectroscopic and Microimage Analysis Perspective of the Chang'e‐5 Lunar Samples

Regolith Properties in the Chang'E-5 Landing Region of the Moon: Results from Multi-Source Remote Sensing Observations

The Lunar Regolith Thickness and Stratigraphy of the Chang'E-6 Landing Site

Thicknesses of Mare Basalts in the Chang'E-5 Landing Region: Implications for the Late-Stage Volcanism on the Moon