Abstract:Cooperation in social dilemmas plays a pivotal role in the formation of systems at all levels of complexity, from replicating molecules to multi-cellular organisms to human and animal societies. In spite of its ubiquity, the origin and stability of cooperation pose an evolutionary conundrum, since cooperation, though beneficial to others, is costly to the individual cooperator. Thus natural selection would be expected to favor selfish behavior in which individuals reap the benefits of cooperation without bearing the costs of cooperating themselves. Many proximate mechanisms have been proposed to account for the origin and maintenance of cooperation, including kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, and evolution in structured populations. Despite the apparent diversity of these approaches they all share a unified underlying logic: namely, each mechanism results in assortative interactions in which individuals using the same strategy interact with a higher probability than they would at random. Here we study the evolution of cooperation in both discrete strategy and continuous strategy social dilemmas with assortative interactions. For the sake of tractability, assortativity is modeled by an individual interacting with another of the same type with probability r and interacting with a random individual in the population with probability 1−r, where r is a parameter that characterizes the degree of assortativity in the system. For discrete strategy social dilemmas we use both a generalization of replicator dynamics and individual-based simulations to elucidate the donation, snowdrift, and sculling games with assortative interactions, and determine the analogs of Hamilton’s rule, which govern the evolution of cooperation in these games. For continuous strategy social dilemmas we employ both a generalization of deterministic adaptive dynamics and individual-based simulations to study the donation, snowdrift, and tragedy of the commons games, and determine the effect of assortativity on the emergence and stability of cooperation.

Evolving cooperation

The evolution of cooperation

Evolutionary Dynamics Drives Role Specialization in a Community of Players

Dynamics of heuristics selection for cooperative behaviour

The collapse of cooperation in evolving games

Coevolutionary games—A mini review

Evolutionary dynamics within and among competing groups

The evolution of cooperation: an evolutionary advantage of individuals impedes the evolution of the population

Evolutionary game selection creates cooperative environments

Game theory in biology: 50 years and onwards

Evolutionary game theory and the tower of Babel of cooperation: Altruism, free-riding, parasitism and the structure of the interactions in a world with finite resources

Synthetically engineered microbes reveal interesting principles of cooperation

Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions

Evolution of Cooperation in Spatio-Temporal Evolutionary Games with Public Goods Feedback

Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games

Relative importance of social synergy, assortation and networks in the evolution of social cooperation

Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species

Spatial alignment, group strategy and non-kin selection enable the evolution of cooperation

Review on Model of Cooperation Evolution

The importance of mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation

Playing against the fittest: A simple strategy that promotes the emergence of cooperation