In vitro bioaccessibility round robin testing for arsenic and lead in standard reference materials and soil samples

Matt Dodd,Deanna Lee,Jasen Nelson,Sergei Verenitch,Ross Wilson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4891
2024-02-10
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Abstract:In this study, we assessed the suitability of using a standard reference material (SRM) other than National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2710a or NIST 2711a in USEPA Method 1340 to determine arsenic (As) and lead (Pb) in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) and the capabilities of Canadian‐based laboratories to perform the method. Five laboratories participated in an initial round robin study and analyzed NIST 2710a, NIST 2711a, BGS119, and Enviromat SS‐2. Intra‐ and inter‐laboratory variability were generally acceptable with percentage relative standard deviations (RSD) of less than 20%. The mean total As and Pb concentrations obtained for BGS119 (332 and 936 mg/kg, respectively) and the mean IVBA values (As = 14.3% and Pb = 78.1%) suggested it may be a suitable and acceptable SRM, whereas the concentration of As in Enviromat SS‐2 as received (3.2 mg/kg) was deemed too low. Ten soil samples from sites with varying land use were analyzed in a follow‐up round robin study using the modified IVBA method that included BGS119 as SRM. The concentrations of As and Pb in the IVBA extracts reported by the participating laboratories were comparable. The mean As IVBA values for the field‐collected samples ranged from 0.1% to 56.4%; for Pb, they ranged from 7.0% to 121%. The lowest IVBA values were measured in mine site samples; the highest values were associated with smelter‐affected soils. The low IVBA values correlated with high iron content. Intra‐ and interlaboratory reproducibility were acceptable (RSD
environmental sciences,toxicology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?