Subjective Evaluation of Driver Assistance Systems in an International Sample

S. Wolter

Abstract:The following research focused on the subjective evaluation of driver assistance systems in an international sample. Longitudinal and lateral driver assistance systems as well as parking support systems were evaluated using survey data. The question was how the systems are evaluated subjectively and how the evaluation depends on demographic factors like home country, age, gender, yearly mileage, and system experience. Based on the available literature in this research area, differences with regard to the subjective evaluation of the systems as well as with regard to the demographic factors were expected. The first study focused on gathering qualitative data on lateral and longitudinal driver assistance systems. The data was further analyzed quantitatively. The second study focused on a quantitative survey evaluating the importance and annoyance of longitudinal and lateral driver assistance systems. The third study was also a survey, gathering the usage frequency and usefulness rating of parking driver assistance systems. The fourth and final study featured an evaluation of a prototype remote parking aid system during real usage. Its rating was compared to the data from the survey in the third study. The results showed a positive rating of the information only blind spot detection system. The actively intervening lateral support system lane keeping aid received a high annoyance rating. Parking driver assistance systems were in general positively evaluated. Only a valet parking aid function that requires the driver to stay in the car was less appreciated. There was a higher prevalence of perpendicular parking in the USA compared to other countries, which hardly influenced the rating of parking driver assistance systems. There was no meaningful influence of demographic factors such as home country, age, gender, yearly mileage, and system experience on the rating of adaptive cruise control and semi-automated parallel and perpendicular parking as example systems. The evaluation of the remote parking aid system presented in the final study showed a high similarity to the data gained from the survey in the third study. The results are partly in line, and partly contradict the findings in the available literature. The validity of the results is discussed, as a convenience sample from an international automotive manufacturer was used for the studies. Finally, ideas for future research are generated.

Engineering,Computer Science