Long-term outcomes of S-1 combined with low-dose docetaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N-1 study, phase II trial) in patients with operable breast cancer

Soichiro Sasa,Hiroaki Inoue,Misako Nakagawa,Hiroaki Toba,Masakazu Goto,Kazumasa Okumura,Mariko Misaki,Tomohiro Inui,Sawaka Yukishige,Aya Nishisho,Naoki Hino,Miyuki Kanematsu,Yoshimi Bando,Hisanori Uehara,Akira Tangoku,Hiromitsu Takizawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.02.014
IF: 3.078
2024-02-23
Clinical Breast Cancer
Abstract:Background We previously reported that S-1 and low-dose docetaxel (DOC) (N-1 study, phase II trial) could be a well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant chemotherapies (NACs) for patients with operable breast cancer. Herein, we analyzed the long-term outcomes and developed clinicopathological and molecular predictors of pathological complete response (pCR). Patients and Methods Eighty-three patients received S-1 (40 mg/m 2 orally on days 1–14) and DOC (40 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1) every 3 weeks for 4–8 cycles. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed for each population with a pCR status. To assess the relationship between pCR and clinicopathological factors such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs, 1+ 50%) and nuclear grade (NG), microarray was used to compare the microRNA profiles of the pCR and nonpCR groups using core needle biopsy specimens. Results With a median follow-up duration of 99.0 (range, 9.0–129.0) months, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were 80.7% and 90.9%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate of the pCR group was significantly better than that of the nonpCR group (100% vs. 86.2%, p=0.0176). Specifically in triple-negative patients, the difference was significant (100% vs. 60.0%, p=0.0224). Multivariate analysis revealed that high TILs (≥2–3+) and NG 2–3 independently predicted pCR. Microarray data revealed that three miRNAs (miR-215-5p, miR-196a-5p, and miR-196b-5p) were significantly upregulated in the pCR group. Conclusion Our NAC regimen achieved favorable long-term outcomes and significantly improved OS in the pCR group. High TILs, NG 2–3, and some miRNAs may be predictors of pCR.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?