Abstract:There has been a significant surge of interest recently around the concept of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), where the goal is to produce an interpretation for a decision made by a machine learning algorithm. Of particular interest is the interpretation of how deep neural networks make decisions, given the complexity and `black box' nature of such networks. Given the infancy of the field, there has been very limited exploration into the assessment of the performance of explainability methods, with most evaluations centered around subjective visual interpretation of the produced interpretations. In this study, we explore a more machine-centric strategy for quantifying the performance of explainability methods on deep neural networks via the notion of decision-making impact analysis. We introduce two quantitative performance metrics: i) Impact Score, which assesses the percentage of critical factors with either strong confidence reduction impact or decision changing impact, and ii) Impact Coverage, which assesses the percentage coverage of adversarially impacted factors in the input. A comprehensive analysis using this approach was conducted on several state-of-the-art explainability methods (LIME, SHAP, Expected Gradients, GSInquire) on a ResNet-50 deep convolutional neural network using a subset of ImageNet for the task of image classification. Experimental results show that the critical regions identified by LIME within the tested images had the lowest impact on the decision-making process of the network (~38%), with progressive increase in decision-making impact for SHAP (~44%), Expected Gradients (~51%), and GSInquire (~76%). While by no means perfect, the hope is that the proposed machine-centric strategy helps push the conversation forward towards better metrics for evaluating explainability methods and improve trust in deep neural networks.

PRIME: Posterior reconstruction of the input for model explanations

A Unified Framework for Input Feature Attribution Analysis

How Well Do Feature-Additive Explainers Explain Feature-Additive Predictors?

Quantifying Explainability in Outcome-Oriented Predictive Process Monitoring

Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Subspaces

Do Explanations Reflect Decisions? A Machine-centric Strategy to Quantify the Performance of Explainability Algorithms

Comparison of feature importance measures as explanations for classification models

Explainable AI without Interpretable Model

The Impact of Explanations on AI Competency Prediction in VQA

Helpful, Misleading or Confusing: How Humans Perceive Fundamental Building Blocks of Artificial Intelligence Explanations

T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients

Solving the enigma: Deriving optimal explanations of deep networks

Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Models

Model Interpretation and Explainability: Towards Creating Transparency in Prediction Models

A Study on Multimodal and Interactive Explanations for Visual Question Answering

XAI-TRIS: Non-linear image benchmarks to quantify false positive post-hoc attribution of feature importance

Selective Explanations

The Analysis and Development of an XAI Process on Feature Contribution Explanation.

Harnessing Explanations to Bridge AI and Humans

A Comparative Analysis of Model Agnostic Techniques for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations