0244 Time Poverty as a Potential Pathway of Sleep Disparities Among Four Disability Populations

Michelle Garrison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0244

IF: 6.313

2024-04-20

SLEEP

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Past research has found that increased sleep disparities in populations experiencing disability, and this has often been attributed to increases in pain, stress, and comorbid conditions. However, it is also possible that the excess time burdens imposed by life with disability may also play a mediating role, especially in those with other risk factors for time poverty. Methods The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is an annual cross-sectional survey sampled to be representative of the non-institutionalized US adult population. Using the 2022 data for 18-65 year-olds, we conducted survey weighted linear regression models to evaluate the impact of four disability categories (deafness, blindness, mobility impairment, and difficulties with concentrating, remembering, or making decisions) on sleep duration in cumulative models 1) adjusting for age category and sex, 2) adding poor health and financial stress, and 3) stratifying by risk for time poverty (risk index based on employment, children in the home, caregiving load, poor access to reliable transportation, and rural location). Results The analytic sample included 153,040 adults, with 24.4% endorsing at least one of the four disabilities, with prevalence ranging from 4.4% (deaf or hard of hearing) to 14.0% (difficulty with concentrating, remembering, or making decisions). All four disability categories were associated with decreased sleep duration (such as a 20.2 minute deficit, 95%CI 16.7-23.7 in those with mobility impairment), which remained significant after adjusting for poor health and financial stress. The sleep deficits associated with disability categories were consistently about twice as large among those in the top decile of the time poverty risk index as in the rest of the sample. Conclusion All disability categories measured by BRFSS are associated with sleep disparities, and these are exacerbated among those with other risk factors for time poverty, consistent with the time burden hypothesis, as those with multiple risk factors for time poverty would have less flexibility to allocate additional time without sacrificing sleep. Especially given that those experiencing disabilities are under-represented in much of the broader sleep literature, as are those with time poverty, sleep disparities in these populations are a crucial area for more robust exploration. Support (if any)

neurosciences,clinical neurology