Effect of cloud microphysical processes on surface wind of a squall line in South China

Zhiyuan Chen,Pengguo Zhao,Hui Xiao,Chuanfeng Zhao,Huiqi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107828
IF: 5.965
2024-12-02
Atmospheric Research
Abstract:The influence of microphysical processes on surface wind speeds is primarily indirect, primarily occurring through downdraft cooling and latent heat variations. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model was adopted in this study to simulate a squall line that occurred in South China from May 6 to 7, 2023, during which the strongest observed surface wind reached 40.1 m s −1 . This study analyzed the impact of microphysical processes on the strong surface winds of the squall line. The results showed that all four microphysics schemes—Thompson, Thompson aerosol-aware (Thompson-A), Morrison, and WSM6—could reproduce the strong winds of the squall line. The Thompson scheme was best suited for simulating the extremely high winds associated with the squall line process selected for this experiment. This scheme generated the strongest winds, largely owing to a concentrated precipitation area that produced strong negative buoyancy in localized regions. This effect was further intensified by high rates of rain evaporation and precipitation particle drag, which reduced downdraft interference and concentrated strong winds in specific areas. Additionally, the smaller raindrop sizes in both the Thompson and Thompson-A schemes enhanced evaporation, increased cooling, and strengthened downdrafts. However, the Thompson scheme achieved greater wind intensities than the Thompson-A scheme because of higher localized evaporation rates and a more focused precipitation distribution. In contrast, the Morrison and WSM6 schemes resulted in more dispersed cooling effects and weaker surface winds owing to broader evaporation areas and increased downdraft interference. However, in the Thompson-A scheme, the actual evaporation was somewhat weaker, likely influenced by the environmental temperature, which, along with the broader precipitation distribution, resulted in weaker surface winds than in the Thompson scheme. The Morrison scheme showed interference among downdrafts as they spread at the surface, leading to weaker surface winds. In the WSM6 scheme, a wider evaporation region and multiple negative buoyancy centers dispersed the effects of negative buoyancy because of broad precipitation and evaporation regions, further weakening the surface winds.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?