Minimal envy and popular matchings

Aleksei Y. Kondratev,Alexander S. Nesterov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.03.060
IF: 6.4
2022-02-01
European Journal of Operational Research
Abstract:<p>We study ex-post fairness and efficiency in the object allocation problem. A matching is individually fair if it minimizes the number of envying agents, we call it <em>minimal envy matching</em>, and conditional on being minimal envy also minimizes the number of envying agents in a reduced problem, we call it <em>minimal envy-2 matching</em>. A matching is socially fair if supported by the majority of agents against any other matching – <em>popular matching</em>. We observe that when a popular matching exists it is equivalent to a minimal envy-2 matching.</p><p>We show the equivalence between global and local popularity: a matching is popular if and only if in no group of size up to 3 agents a majority can benefit by exchanging objects, keeping the remaining matching fixed. We algorithmically show that an arbitrary matching is path-connected with a popular matching by locally-popular exchanges in small groups. Thus a corresponding market converges to a popular matching.</p><p>Popular matchings often do not exist. We define <em>most popular matching</em> as a matching that is popular among the largest (by cardinality) subset of agents. We show that a matching is minimal envy-2 if and only if it is minimal envy and most popular, and propose a polynomial-time algorithm to find a Pareto efficient minimal envy-2 matching.</p>
operations research & management science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?