1 FOUNDATIONS AND APPLICATIONS OF THE EMPIRICAL SIMILITUDE METHOD ( ESM )
Alan J. Dutson,K. Wood,Cullen
Abstract:Engineering design and manufacturing research have matured and evolved greatly over the last two decades. On the one hand, methods in engineering design are significantly impacting industry practice. They have also dramatically changed our classroom instruction and teaching pedagogies in engineering. On the other hand, new manufacturing processes have been commercialized and infused into production lines. These same processes are being used to prototype, quickly, our ideas in the engineering classroom. Functional testing represents an important bridge between design and manufacturing processes. During product development, functional testing of models and prototypes offers significant advantages over direct product testing. However, two primary issues have historically prevented effective functional testing with prototypes: prediction accuracy and confidence in scale testing results. The traditional similarity method, which is based on dimensional analysis, is commonly applied to perform scale testing. However, this method may not provide accurate scale testing results, especially when distortions exist, such as differences in available model and product material. This presentation focuses on an innovative empirical similarity method (ESM) to overcome such limitations. ESM is based on the premise of using specimen pairs to improve prediction accuracy. The theoretical foundations of this approach are presented, in addition to its relationship with traditional similitude and the bounds on its utility. Based on ESM’s theoretical development, two applications are presented. These applications include structural design of a basic cantilever member and design of a heat sink device. Empirical results are shown for the applications, including full-scale product testing. 1 Background Product design and development processes recursively synthesize products that satisfy customer needs and functional requirements within limited temporal and financial resources (Pahl and Beitz, 1985; Ullman, 1992; Otto and Wood 2000). Companies continuously collect and analyze functional, aesthetic, ergonomic, and manufacturing information to produce quality products. The effort required to obtain such information is one of the key factors that determines the performance of the design process (Holmes, 1991; Ulrich and Eppinger 1995; Otto and Wood 2000). Various types of virtual and physical models are utilized to provide proper functional information for a product. Virtual models are preferred to physical models in many cases because of their high flexibility, short development time, and relatively low cost. Despite significant advances in virtual modeling, however, the natural phenomena that can be accurately and confidently represented purely by virtual models are still very limited. Thus, companies typically utilize both virtual and physical models to verify and refine product designs.