Exploring miR‐21 as a key regulator in two distinct approaches of bone marrow stromal cells differentiation into Schwann‐like cells

Yu‐Mei Liu,He‐Ying Wang,Cai‐Hong Wei,Jun‐Ping Li,Ying Wang,Wen‐Zhi Ma,Hua Jia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.22293
2024-05-25
Synapse
Abstract:BMSCs were induced to differentiate into SCLCs by compound factor (Protocol‐1) and conditioned medium (Protocol‐2), respectively. Then, the upregulation of miR‐21 inhibited SPYR2 expression and activated ERK1/2 signaling pathway, thereby promoting the differentiation of BMSCs into SCLCs. This study can provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the induction regimen of BMSCs and the targeted therapy of PNI. The differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) into Schwann‐like cells (SCLCs) has the potential to promote the structural and functional restoration of injured axons. However, the optimal induction protocol and its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different induction protocols in promoting the differentiation of rat BMSCs into SCLCs and to explore their potential mechanisms. BMSCs were induced using two distinct methods: a composite factor induction approach (Protocol‐1) and a conditioned culture medium induction approach (Protocol‐2). The expression of Schwann cells (SCs) marker proteins and neurotrophic factors (NTFs) in the differentiated cells was assessed. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were also measured. During induction, changes in miR‐21 and Sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 2 (SPRY2) mRNA were analyzed. Following the transfection of BMSCs with miR‐21 agomir or miR‐21 antagomir, induction was carried out using both protocols, and the expression of SPRY2, ERK1/2, and SCs marker proteins was examined. The results revealed that NTFs expression was higher in Protocol‐1, whereas SCs marker proteins expression did not significantly differ between the two groups. Compared to Protocol‐1, Protocol‐2 exhibited enhanced cell proliferation and fewer apoptotic and necrotic cells. Both protocols showed a negative correlation between miR‐21 and SPRY2 expression throughout the induction stages. After induction, the miR‐21 agomir group exhibited reduced SPRY2 expression, increased ERK1/2 expression, and significantly elevated expression of SCs marker proteins. This study demonstrates that Protocol‐1 yields higher NTFs expression, whereas Protocol‐2 results in stronger SCLCs proliferation. Upregulating miR‐21 suppresses SPRY2 expression, activates the ERK1/2 signaling pathway, and promotes BMSC differentiation into SCLCs.
neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?