Abstract:The helicase MCM and the ribonucleotide reductase RNR are the complexes that provide the substrates (ssDNA templates and dNTPs, respectively) for DNA replication. Here, we demonstrate that MCM interacts physically with RNR and some of its regulators, including the kinase Dun1. These physical interactions encompass small subpopulations of MCM and RNR, are independent of the major subcellular locations of these two complexes, augment in response to DNA damage and, in the case of the Rnr2 and Rnr4 subunits of RNR, depend on Dun1. Partial disruption of the MCM/RNR interactions impairs the release of Rad52 –but not RPA–from the DNA repair centers despite the lesions are repaired, a phenotype that is associated with hypermutagenesis but not with alterations in the levels of dNTPs. These results suggest that a specifically regulated pool of MCM and RNR complexes plays non-canonical roles in genetic stability preventing persistent Rad52 centers and hypermutagenesis. Cells have to accurately replicate their genomes to avoid loss of genetic information during cell divisions. This is achieved by coordinating the advance of the replication machinery with different mechanisms that prevent and/or repair errors during DNA synthesis. However, different DNA lesions accumulate during DNA replication that are repaired at DNA repair centers by error-free homologous recombination and error-prone translesion synthesis mechanisms. Here, we show that the replicative helicase and the ribonucleotide reductase complexes that provide the substrates (ssDNA templates and dNTPs, respectively) for DNA replication interact with each other in a DNA damage-regulated manner. Furthermore, we observe that these interactions facilitate the dynamics of a key recombination protein (Rad52) at the repair centers and prevent genetic instability by translesion synthesis through mechanisms that are not associated with the canonical functions of the replicative helicase and the ribonucleotide reductase complexes. We propose that these two essential complexes play non-replicative roles in preventing genetic instability in response to DNA damage by genetically regulated physical interactions.

RTF2 controls replication repriming and ribonucleotide excision at the replisome

Abstract IA023: The role of RTF2 in replication and replication stress response

RIF1 Links Replication Timing with Fork Reactivation and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair

Rtt105 Promotes High-Fidelity DNA Replication and Repair by Regulating the Single-Stranded DNA-binding Factor RPA.

USP50 suppresses alternative RecQ helicase use and deleterious DNA2 activity during replication

Interaction with single-stranded DNA-binding protein localizes ribonuclease HI to DNA replication forks and facilitates R-loop removal

Rtt105 functions as a chaperone for replication protein A to preserve genome stability

Tolerating DNA damage by repriming: Gap filling in the spotlight

RNA Polymerase II is a Polar Roadblock to a Progressing DNA Fork

Physical interactions between specifically regulated subpopulations of the MCM and RNR complexes prevent genetic instability

Rtt105 regulates RPA function by configurationally stapling the flexible domains

Topoisomerase 1-Mediated Removal of Ribonucleotides from Nascent Leading-Strand DNA

Fancd2 and Rev1 Cooperate in the Protection of Nascent Dna Strands in Response to Replication Stress

Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This is Exacerbated by SSB

The Extent of Error-Prone Replication Restart by Homologous Recombination is Controlled by Exo1 and Checkpoint Proteins

Histone deposition promotes recombination-dependent replication at arrested forks

The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage

RNA polymerase II promotes the organization of chromatin following DNA replication

Handoff from recombinase to replisome: Insights from transposition

Redundancy in ribonucleotide excision repair: Competition, compensation, and cooperation