International collaboration between low‐middle‐income and high‐income institutions to improve radiation therapy care delivery

Diana Ng,Tatiana De Martin,Po Ting Wu,Peter Huang,Jennifer Davis,Jamil Serdiña,Jamie Nash,Sarah Knighton,Sherwin Cala,Tisha Lee V. Eduave,Anthony Albert Abad
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14306
2024-02-25
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Abstract:Introduction The Philippines is a lower‐middle‐income island country with over 153 000 new cancer diagnosis each year. Despite many patients needing radiotherapy as part of disease management, there remains limitations to access. Currently, the Philippines has 50 linear accelerator facilities serving a population of 110 million. However, given the recommendation of 1 linear accelerator for every 250 thousand people, it is evident that the demand for accessible radiotherapy resources is significantly underserved in the country. This paper outlines the collaboration between GenesisCare Solutions (GCS) and Fairview Cancer Center (FCC) to address efficiency and access within the radiotherapy department at FCC. Methods Through international collaboration between GCS and FCC, areas for improvement were identified and categorized into four domains: Dosimetry quality, Patient workflow, Data & Reporting, and Information Technology (IT) Infrastructure. Action plans were developed then implemented. A baseline measurement was obtained for each domain, and post‐implementation evaluation undertaken at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Data captured within the electronic medical record system was extrapolated, and average treatment times were established for pre‐ and post‐engagement. A paired, 2‐tailed t‐test was used for statistical analysis of outcome parameters using IBM SPSS version 23 for all statistics. Results Twelve months post‐initial engagement, all four domains saw positive outcomes. Improved plan quality linked to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) utilization rates saw an increase from 20% to 54%. A significant reduction in patient average wait times was also observed, from 27 to 17 min (p ≤ 0.001). Prior to engagement, tracking patient demographics and diagnosis was not prioritized, post engagement an average of 92% diagnosis entry compliance was achieved. Conclusion Through the collaboration of GCS and FCC, objectives in all action plan domains were achieved, highlighting the benefits of collaboration between low‐middle‐income and high‐income institutions.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?